Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Baltimore Alliance for Careers in Healthcare Inc

To address unemployment, underemployment and healthcare workforce shortages in the baltimore region by identifying healthcare career pathways and connecting residents to skilled jobs, leading to economic independence.

$25k
Granted FY2019
3
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of BALTIMORE ALLIANCE FOR CAREERS IN HEALTH’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2019 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$746k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEVINDALE HOSPITAL$10,000
SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC$10,000
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $62k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES: $62k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 10 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +70% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2019, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$1.0M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+70%

Still filing today

60%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BA
    BALTIMORE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $228k · revenue +158% · 63% of their budget
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $70k · revenue +81%
  • MC
    Maryland Community Health Initiatives
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $62k · revenue +70%
  • HU
    HELPING UP MISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $27k · revenue +83%
  • BC
    BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medstar Health Inc

Plan, develop, coordinate, direct and manage an integrated healthcare system.

Health
2
Franklin Square Hospital Center Inc

See schedule o medstar franklin square medical center, a member of medstar health, provides the highest quality healthcare and education to our communities.

Health
3
Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation

Johns hopkins health system corporation provides centralized management of a multi-hospital healthcare system. it is a key component of johns hopkins medicine, a collaboration with the johns hopkins university school of medicine.

Health
4
Adventist Healthcare Inc

We extend god's care through the ministry of physical, mental and spiritual healing.

5
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
6
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians Inc

Johns hopkins community physicians, inc (jhcp), a valued member of johns hopkins medicine, is a network of medical practices strategically positioned throughout communities in maryland and dc. we strive to meet the needs of each community…

7
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
8
Northwest Hospital Center Inc

To improve the health of the individuals and communities we serve through compassionate, high quality care.

Health
9
Washington Hospital Center Corporation

See schedule oas a proud member of medstar health, medstar washington hospital center's (mwhc) mission is to deliver exceptional patient-first health care and an exceptional patient experience. mwhc is renowned for handling the region's…

Health
10
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

11
Highmark Health Group

Working as an integrated system within highmark health, employees at all of ahn's care sites, including hospitals, health + wellness pavilions, primary and specialty care offices and more, are committed to improving health and promoting…

12
Upmc Washington

Upmc washington is a secular, not-for-profit community hospital dedicated to improving the health status of the community and providing quality patient care to all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifebridge Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTY — $295,597 · OtherCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF BALTIMORE COUNTYIndividual grant recipient — $267,255 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAROLINE FRIESS CENTER INC — $50,627 · OtherCAROLINE FRIESS CENTER INCGENESIS STAFFING SERVICES — $42,125 · OtherGENESIS STAFFING SERVICESHELPING UP MISSION INC — $26,953 · Other+2 more — $21,394 · OtherBALTIMORE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER — $228,000 · HealthBALTIMORE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION …Maryland Community Health Initiatives — $50,289 · HealthMaryland Community Health Initia…LEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL INC — $20,000 · HealthLEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTE…+4 more — $35,000 · Health+4 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC — $70,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $62,075 · Human ServicesUPWARDLY GLOBAL — $10,000 · Employment
Other$703,951Health$333,289International$70,000Human Services$62,075Employment$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBALTIMORE AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER — $228,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $70,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $62,075 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMaryland Community Health Initiatives — $50,289 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC — $26,953 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEVINDALE HEBREW GERIATRIC CENTER AND HOSPITAL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Medical Center — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENN-NORTH PLAZA INC — $6,047 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL OF MARYLAND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Baltimore Alliance for Careers in Healthcare Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Center for Urban Families Inc36% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc6% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Health Inc1% of income from government
  • Sinai Hospital of Baltimore Inc0% of income from government
  • Levindale Hebrew Geriatric Center and Hospital Inc0% of income from government
  • Mercy Medical Center0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph