Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ballard Miller Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$350k
Granted FY2025still arriving
68
Grants FY2025still arriving
17
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$307kArts & Culture$149kHuman Services$146kHousing & Shelter$128kEnvironment$125kHealth$123kInternational$111kFood & Nutrition$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 68 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k54 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $257k
$1,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$403k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$33,000
OU COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$30,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH$25,000
STANFORD FUND$20,000
HARVARD BUS SCHOOL$20,000
YWCA UTAH$15,000
UTAH FESTIVAL OPERA$14,000
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE$10,000
MALIHEH FREE CLINIC$10,000
OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY$10,000
PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY$10,000
LWTECH FOUNDATION$10,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMM$10,000
SO UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $96k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEROES AND HORSES: $1k → 10%UNITED HELP UKRAINE: $8k → 6%HEROES AND HORSES: $1k → 10%UNITED HELP UKRAINE: $4k → 6%UYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT: $500 → 14%UYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT: $200 → 14%THE ROAD HOME: $250 → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $20k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $20k → 8%THE ROAD HOME: $250 → 8%THE INN BETWEEN: $500 → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $5k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $2k → 8%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IN
OH
PA
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 83 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

83 repeat relationships: 52 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

83
35

Total granted

$1.4M
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+3%

Still filing today

61%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $110k · revenue +55%
  • YW
    Young Women's Christian Association of Utah
    5× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +7%
  • TI
    THE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $60k · revenue +222%

Funded once

  • UD
    UTAH DIVISION OF ARTS & MUSEUMS
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • PF
    PRIVAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SO
    SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ALUMNI ASSOC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
2
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
3
Utah Geological Foundation
—
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
Utah Water Ways Inc

Utah water ways promotes water conservation through collaboration between government, non-profit groups, and private sector partners and empowers the public to be wise stewards of this critical shared resource.

Environment
6
Utah Heritage Foundation

The organization's mission is to keep the past alive, not only for preservation, but to inspire and provoke a more creative present and sustainable future.

Arts & Culture
7
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
8
Utah Open Lands Conservation Association Inc

Utah Open Lands' mission is to preserve and protect open space, in perpetuity, in order to maintain Utah's natural heritage and quality of life for present and future generations. The purpose of Utah Open Lands is to permanently protect…

Environment
9
The Living Planet Inc

We inspire people to explore, discover and learn about earth's diverse ecosystems.

—
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Utah

The organization's mission is to preserve and promote individual civil rights and civil liberties as guaranteed by the united states and utah constitutions and the civil rights laws within the state of utah.

—
11
Aclu of Utah Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to preserve and promote individual civil rights and civil liberties as guaranteed by the united states and utah constitutions and the civil rights laws within the state of utah.

—
12
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah; the most unlike its peers is Breathe Utah. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

72 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 72 of the 131 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
71/72
Grantees still filing
50/72
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $162,650 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH: $110,000 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAHYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah: $95,000 · OtherYoung Women's Christian Association of UtahUNIVERSITY OF UTAH DEPT OF THEATRE: $90,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH DEPT OF THEATREIndividual grant recipient: $80,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 · OtherTHE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $38,000 · OtherHARVARD BUS SCHOOL: $35,500 · OtherOU COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $35,000 · Other+85 more: $301,389 · Other+85 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $54,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TR…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $51,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF O…PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $46,000 · EducationPHILLIPS EXETER…OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $46,000 · EducationOKLAHOMA CITY U…ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL: $9,000 · Education+2 more: $5,650 · EducationTHE ROAD HOME: $40,500 · Human ServicesNeighborhood House Association: $40,000 · Human ServicesUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $14,000 · Human Services+3 more: $3,200 · Human ServicesInternational Rescue Committee INC: $48,000 · InternationalNOVA UKRAINE: $19,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC: $12,000 · InternationalWORLD NEIGHBORS INC: $11,000 · International+4 more: $3,000 · InternationalSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $34,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $21,500 · EnvironmentUTAH PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT: $5,250 · EnvironmentMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $2,650 · Environment+6 more: $2,900 · EnvironmentMaliheh Free Clinic: $49,000 · HealthTHE DR DALE B HULL FOUNDATION FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION INC: $4,300 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,250 · HealthTHE LIVING BANK INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,950 · Health+1 more: $400 · HealthTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $27,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$1,007,539Education$211,650Human Services$97,700International$93,000Environment$66,800Health$57,900Membership Benefit$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH: $110,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYoung Women's Christian Association of Utah: $95,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $54,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $51,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMaliheh Free Clinic: $49,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $48,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY: $46,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $46,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROAD HOME: $40,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNeighborhood House Association: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance: $34,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA: $27,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake: $21,500 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE: $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Help Ukraine Inc: $14,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BROADWAY LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $12,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRAZOM INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD NEIGHBORS INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH PHYSICIANS FOR A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT: $5,250 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetHAWKWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,350 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DR DALE B HULL FOUNDATION FOR NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION INC: $4,300 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANDEAN TEXTILE ARTS INC: $3,500 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION: $3,350 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEdChoice Inc: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $2,650 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION: $2,650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Community Foundation of Utah: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF UTAH: $2,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH ARTS FESTIVAL FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEROES AND HORSES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLEVELAND MAIDAN ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUTAH FESTIVAL OPERA COMPANY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LIVING BANK INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,950 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $1,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $1,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF TRACY AVIARY: $1,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY: $1,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE TO SAVE OUR: $1,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTER THE HOMELESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Museum of Contemporary Art: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLISTENERS COMMUNITY RADIO OF UTAH INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA UTAH ↗
  • Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Utah ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL DARK-SKY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Maliheh Free Clinic ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS EXETER ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE ACTORS' FUND OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS Of Great Salt Lake ↗
  • Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds United Help Ukraine Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BROADWAY LEAGUE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds RAZOM INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD NEIGHBORS INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT39.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Kanter Family Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · Katherine W Dumke & Ezekiel R Dumke Jr Foundation · Janet Q Lawson Foundation · Cumming Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ballard Miller Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ballard Miller Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • World Neighbors Inc: 46% of income from government
  • All Classical Public Media Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ballard Miller Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ballard Miller Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 131 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ballard Miller’s filings →

More from the funding graph