Skip to content

· Private foundation

Baker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

57% of Baker Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Baker Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $44k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’19
3
’20
2
’21
4
’22
2
’23
6
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$186kEducation$57kRecreation & Sports$22kHealth$20kAnimals$10kHuman Services$5kCivil Rights$3kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY$10,000
UCSF FOUNDATION$7,500
CONSTELLATION FUND$7,000
CAN DO CAININES$5,000
ALBRIGHT FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$3,000
GUILD SERVICES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CAMP O'DAYEN: $5k → 6%FRIENDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $10k → 11%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA HOPSITAL: $8k → 14%UCSF BENIFOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $7k → 10%DECKER FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 20%MARY BAKER PHILBIN DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 14%WILLIAM J SHERMAN DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 11%SHINE ALBRIGHT: $5k → 15%BAKER FL CHARITABLE ACCOUNT: $5k → 12%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $5k → 14%CAMP O'DAYEN: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $10k → 11%PINEO FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 14%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $25k → 10%DECKER FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 20%MARY BAKER PHILBIN DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 14%WILLIAM J SHERMAN DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $10k → 11%PINEO FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 14%SCHWAB CHARITABLE FUND: $25k → 10%CAMP ODAYN: $4k → 6%CONSTELLATION FUND: $10k → 11%CONSTELLATION FUND: $7k → 11%FRIENDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $6k → 11%FRIENDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $5k → 11%THE CONSTELLATION FUND: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $5k → 11%ALBRIGHT FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%MORRIS T BAKER DONOR ADVISED FUND: $5k → 11%CREATE A MEMORY: $5k → 11%CREATE A MEMORY: $5k → 11%CREATE A MEMORY: $5k → 11%CREATE A MEMORY: $5k → 11%CREATE A MEMORY: $5k → 11%CREATE A MEMORY: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%THREE RIVERS PARK: $7k → 11%PRIDE IN FAMILY LIVING: $5k → 11%THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT: $5k → 11%COURAGE CENTER: $3k → 11%CAN DO CAININES: $5k → 11%CAN DO CANINES: $5k → 11%MAPLE GROVE GIRL GOLF: $5k → 11%DUNWOODY COLLEGE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
CA
NE
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$183k · 10 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$183k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+135%

Still filing today

40%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $51k · revenue +64%
  • TC
    The Constellation Fund
    3× · 2022–2025 · $22k · revenue +60%
  • CO
    CAMP ODAYIN
    4× · 2019–2023 · $12k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • UB
    UCSF BENIFOFF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
2
University of Minnesota Foundation

A non-profit organization with the sole purpose of supporting the university of minnesota with a mission to connect passion with possibility, inspire generosity, and support greatness at the university of minnesota.

Education
3
St Luke's Foundation Inc

An exceptional education that inspires a deep love of learning, a strong moral compass, the commitment to serve, and the confidence to lead.

Education
4
Great Mn Schools

We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Dakotabilities Inc

Together, we create a warm and welcoming community enriching the lives of those we support.

Human Services
7
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
8
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
9
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
10
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
11
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
12
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc; the most unlike its peers is Albright Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $51,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARYIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATIONDECKER FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $10,000 · OtherWILLIAM J SHERMAN DONOR ADVISED FUND: $10,000 · OtherCAN DO CANINES: $10,000 · OtherPINEO FAMILY DONOR ADVISED FUND: $10,000 · OtherMARY BAKER PHILBIN DONOR ADVISED FUND: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,500 · Other+14 more: $58,700 · Other+14 moreDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $90,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCThe Constellation Fund: $22,000 · PhilanthropyThe Constellation FundALBRIGHT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyCAMP ODAYIN: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationSHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $500 · Education+1 more: $200 · Education
Other$215,200Philanthropy$117,000Recreation & Sports$12,000Education$8,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY: $51,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetThe Constellation Fund: $22,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP ODAYIN: $12,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCAN DO CANINES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBRIGHT FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGuild: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds The Constellation Fund ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ODAYIN ↗
  • Who funds CAN DO CANINES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALBRIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Guild ↗
  • Who funds SHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph