Skip to content
Bailey Tuvell Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Bailey Tuvell Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$389k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

International$150kHealth$149kFood & Nutrition$100kArts & Culture$55kEducation$45kCivil Rights$20kEnvironment$10kRecreation & Sports$9k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $84k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$48,860
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT$150,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$100,000
AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$50,000
GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION$48,860
3 MARIPOSAS MONTESSORI FOUNDATION INC$25,000
HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY$10,000
MCA DENVER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ATOMIC ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $9k → 11%UPSTREAM USA INC: $20k → 16%GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE INC: $20k → 17%AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%3 MARIPOSAS MONTESSORI FOUNDATION INC: $25k → 12%HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $10k → 8%GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $49k → 12%DOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT: $150k → 10%CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $20k → 17%3 MARIPOSAS MONTESSORI FOUNDATION INC: $20k → 12%GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $25k → 12%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC: $20k → 17%MCA DENVER: $5k → 12%FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
2
Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation

The mission of Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation is to advance scientific knowledge in the fields of reproductive biology and women's health; translate this knowledge into improved health for women and infants; train current…

Health
3
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International
4
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
5
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
6
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
7
Power to Decide

Power to decide envisions a world where everyone - no matter who they are or where they live - has control over their bodies and can decide if, when, and under what circumstances to get pregnant and have a child. its mission is to advance…

Human Services
8
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
9
National Perinatal Information Center

The national perinatal information center (npic) is dedicated to the improvement of perinatal health through comparative data analysis, program evaluation, health services research and professional continuing education.

Health
10
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
11
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
12
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Atomic Athletic Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT INC: $150,000 · InternationalDOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AN…GLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $73,860 · HealthGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME F…Upstream USA Inc: $20,000 · HealthUpstream USA IncCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S DIABETES FO…FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $100,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCK…THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN IND…Guttmacher Institute Inc: $20,000 · OtherGuttmacher Insti…HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $10,000 · OtherHIGH LINE CANAL …3 Mariposas Montessori Foundation Inc: $45,000 · Philanthropy3 Maripos…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsAtomic Athletic Foundation: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
International$150,000Health$108,860Food & Nutrition$100,000Other$80,000Philanthropy$45,000Civil Rights$40,000Youth Development$8,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDOMINICAN REPUBLIC EDUCATION AND MENTORING PROJECT INC: $150,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $73,860 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget3 Mariposas Montessori Foundation Inc: $45,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUpstream USA Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S DIABETES FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAtomic Athletic Foundation: $8,500 over 1y, 32% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART DENVER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bailey Tuvell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bailey Tuvell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Upstream Usa Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Dominican Republic Education and Mentoring Project Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bailey Tuvell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home