· Private foundation
Bailey Frederick a Tr Uwill
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEARTH INC | $15,000 |
| The Home for Little Wanderers | $10,000 |
| EMPATH | $10,000 |
| THE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND | $5,000 |
| FRANCIS QUIMET-BAILEY SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $5,000 |
| BOSTON MISSIONARY BAPTIST COMMUNITY CENT | $5,000 |
| BOTTOM LINE INC | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY BOATING INC | $5,000 |
| ADOLESCENT CONSULTATION SERVICES INC | $5,000 |
| BOSTON POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE | $5,000 |
| PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL EDUCATION FOR ASSISTANCE DOG SE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EMECONOMIC MOBILITY PATHWAYS INC6× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +50%
THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC4× · 2021–2025 · $40k · revenue +54%- TCTHE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC6× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- FQFRANCIS QUIMET-BAILEY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2025 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To promote the growth and development of children while teaching them how to learn efficiently and experience the joy of learning
The brookline center for community mental health provides groundbreaking mental health services rooted in meaningful innovation and compassionate care. in response to today's mental health landscape and the ongoing mental health crisis,…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
To advance the interests of the human services sector and providers through advocacy, education, and engagement of diverse stakeholders for collective impact.
To equip those we serve with the skills to become self-sufficient productive members of their communities and society.
Easter seals massachusetts is a statewide community-based organization that has been helping people with disabilities to live full and independent lives for over 75 years. our mission is to provide services to ensure that children and…
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boston Missionary Baptist Community Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ECONOMIC MOBILITY PATHWAYS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARROLL CENTER FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MISSIONARY BAPTIST COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PAL OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds ADOLESCENT CONSULTATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY BOATING INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRANCIS OUIMET SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEADS INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT FAMILY SERVICES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds WEDIKO CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Paul & Edith Babson Foundation 106846-000 · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bailey Frederick a Tr Uwill funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Perkins School for the Blind — 7% of income from government
- Economic Mobility Pathways Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc — 3% of income from government
- Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bailey Frederick a Tr Uwill?
Find your warmest path to Bailey Frederick a Tr Uwill through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.