Skip to content
Bailey Co Decl 11 30 53 Char Fd at a glance

· Private foundation

Bailey Co Decl 11 30 53 Char Fd

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$46k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$248kArts & Culture$14kRecreation & Sports$12kFood & Nutrition$6kHuman Services$6kEnvironment$4kInternational$2k
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST$22,000
HAMILTON COLLEGE$12,000
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OUR NEIGHBORS TABLE: $2k → 10%OUR NEIGHBORS' TABLE: $2k → 10%OUR NEIGHBORS' TABLE: $2k → 10%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $2k → 10%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $2k → 10%JEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 13 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$200k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+22%

Still filing today

69%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    3× · 2024–2026 · $36k · revenue +4%
  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $30k · revenue +19%
  • AE
    Amesbury Educational Foundation Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • Elon Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • OS
    OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +17%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
4
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
5
Reed Institute

The mission of Reed College is to provide education in the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
8
Emmanuel College

Emmanuel college is a coed, residential catholic liberal arts and sciences college with 2,112 undergraduate and graduate students.

Education
9
President and Fellows of Middlebury College

Through a commitment to immersive learning, we prepare students to lead engaged, consequential, and creative lives, contribute to their communities, and address the world's most challenging problems.

Education
10
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
11
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
12
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University; the most unlike its peers is Coastal Trails Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST: $34,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERSTTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITYWORCESTER POLYTECH INSTITUTE: $20,000 · OtherWORCESTER POLYTECH INSTITUTEOREGON STATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherOREGON STATE UNIVERSITYAmesbury Educational Foundation Inc: $10,000 · OtherAmesbury Educational Foundation IncWINNERS CIRCLE RUNNING CLUB: $6,000 · Other+2 more: $4,000 · OtherRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $36,000 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $30,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSSTrustees of Hamilton College: $12,000 · EducationTrustees of Hamilton CollegeElon University: $10,000 · EducationElon UniversityTrustees of Tufts College: $10,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYOur Neighbors' Table Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesLowell's Maritime Foundation Inc: $6,000 · Arts & CultureAmesbury Carriage Museum Inc: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCOASTAL TRAILS COALITION INC: $6,000 · EnvironmentMERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $4,000 · Environment
Other$114,000Education$108,000Human Services$12,000Arts & Culture$12,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $36,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetElon University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmesbury Educational Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Neighbors' Table Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLowell's Maritime Foundation Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOASTAL TRAILS COALITION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetJEANNE GEIGER CRISIS CENTER INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmesbury Carriage Museum Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Institution for Savin…The Provident Communi…Newburyport Bank Char…Essex County Communit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation Inc · The Provident Community Charitable Organization Inc · Newburyport Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bailey Co Decl 11 30 53 Char Fd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bailey Co Decl 11 30 53 Char Fd. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Jeanne Geiger Crisis Center Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Our Neighbors' Table Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bailey Co Decl 11 30 53 Char Fd’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home