Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bailey & Lucy Evans Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$99kHealth$23kYouth Development$18kCrime & Legal$14kReligion$11kFood & Nutrition$7kRecreation & Sports$7kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,900
Median grant
1
States reached
$350k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$3,800
Individual grant recipient$2,000
JUNIOR'S HOUSE INC$1,900
CAREGIVER RELIEF PROGRAM OF BEDFORD COUNTY$1,900
CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT$1,900
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$1,900
HAVEN OF HOPE OF DEKALB COUNTY$1,900
BELIEVERS FAITH FELLOWSHIP$1,500
BLUE MONARCH$1,500
CASA WORKS INC$1,479
FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE$1,100
HOMES OF HOPE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
A BRIDGE OF HOPE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $5k → 13%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $4k → 13%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2k → 13%CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 13%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2k → 13%CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 13%CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 13%CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $2k → 13%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2k → 13%COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$197k · 20 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$197k
$6k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthArts & CultureEmploymentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +32%
  • JH
    JUNIORS HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +60%
  • CW
    CASA WORKS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • CH
    CASCADE HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL TOUCHDOWN CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • RR
    ROSENWALD RECREATION & COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Turning Point Center for Families

Counseling services provided to women and families

Arts & Culture
2
Robertson County Child Advocacy Cen

Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.

Crime & Legal
3
Children's Safety Center

Child abuse victim assistance

Crime & Legal
4
Multi-County Youth & Family Services Inc

Community-based counseling, social services, prevention and diversionary youth services program. Provides child abuse/neglect and/or family violence crisis intervention, prevention and treatment to families & children

Human Services
5
The Caring Place a Center for Abused Women and Children Inc

Caring for abused women & children

—
6
Friends of Tazewell County Cac

Provide crisis counseling to child victims of sexual abuse and their families

Crime & Legal
7
Creative Change Counseling

Working together with families and communities for children to help keep them healthy safe and smart

Health
8
Hanmi Family Counseling Center Inc

Counseling

Human Services
9
The Toby Center for Family Transitions Inc

Organization provides family mediation, supervised visitation, supprot groups, therapeutic interventions

Human Services
10
Covenant Behavioral Health

Counseling

Health
11
Childrens Crisis Center of Stanislaus County

Child abuse prevention

Crime & Legal
12
Boone County Casa

Advocacy for abused and neglected children

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Juniors House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caregiver Relief Program of Bedford. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $16,900 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBELIEVERS FAITH FELLOWSHIP: $9,500 · OtherBELIEVERS FAITH FELLOWSHIPSOUTH CENTRAL RELATIVE CAREGIVER PROGRAM: $8,500 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL RELATIVE CAREGIVER PROGRAMA BRIDGE OF HOPE: $7,400 · OtherA BRIDGE OF HOPECHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $6,000 · OtherCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERHOMES OF HOPE: $5,431 · OtherHOMES OF HOPEFAMILY SUPPORT PROGRAM OF TENNESSEE: $3,500 · Other+8 more: $9,640 · Other+8 moreCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $27,300 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY DEVELOPME…THE CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $7,753 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR FAMI…HAVEN OF HOPE OF DEKALB COUNTY INC: $16,821 · HealthHAVEN OF HOPE OF D…CAREGIVER RELIEF PROGRAM OF BEDFORD: $15,900 · HealthCAREGIVER RELIEF P…JUNIORS HOUSE INC: $17,900 · Crime & LegalJUNIORS HOUSE INCCASA WORKS INC: $14,229 · Crime & LegalCASA WORKS INCBLUE MONARCH: $9,242 · EmploymentSHELBYVILLE COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $7,460 · Food & NutritionBEDFORD COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $3,100 · Arts & CultureFAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $2,600 · Recreation & Sports
Other$80,871Human Services$35,053Health$32,721Crime & Legal$32,129Employment$9,242Food & Nutrition$7,460Arts & Culture$3,100Recreation & Sports$2,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $27,300 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJUNIORS HOUSE INC: $17,900 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHAVEN OF HOPE OF DEKALB COUNTY INC: $16,821 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetCAREGIVER RELIEF PROGRAM OF BEDFORD: $15,900 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetCASA WORKS INC: $14,229 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetBLUE MONARCH: $9,242 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT: $7,753 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSHELBYVILLE COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN: $7,460 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetBEDFORD COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC: $3,100 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC: $2,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JUNIORS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE OF DEKALB COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREGIVER RELIEF PROGRAM OF BEDFORD ↗
  • Who funds CASA WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MONARCH ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds SHELBYVILLE COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds BEDFORD COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital TrustTN15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bailey & Lucy Evans Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bailey & Lucy Evans Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bailey & Lucy Evans’ filings →

    More from the funding graph