· Private foundation
Bailey & Lucy Evans Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER | $3,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $1,900 |
| JUNIOR'S HOUSE INC | $1,900 |
| CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT | $1,900 |
| CAREGIVER RELIEF PROGRAM OF BEDFORD COUNTY | $1,900 |
| HAVEN OF HOPE OF DEKALB COUNTY | $1,900 |
| BELIEVERS FAITH FELLOWSHIP | $1,500 |
| BLUE MONARCH | $1,500 |
| CASA WORKS INC | $1,479 |
| FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE | $1,100 |
| HOMES OF HOPE | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| A BRIDGE OF HOPE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CDCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +32%
- JHJUNIORS HOUSE INC9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +78%
- CWCASA WORKS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- CHCASCADE HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL TOUCHDOWN CLUBone grant, 2020 · $2k
- RRROSENWALD RECREATION & COMMUNITY CENTERone grant, 2021 · $2k
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2018 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Counseling services provided to women and families
Effective prosecution of child abuses, providing therapy and education for the abused, and providing a safe haven for the abused.
Child abuse victim assistance
Community-based counseling, social services, prevention and diversionary youth services program. Provides child abuse/neglect and/or family violence crisis intervention, prevention and treatment to families & children
Caring for abused women & children
Provide crisis counseling to child victims of sexual abuse and their families
Working together with families and communities for children to help keep them healthy safe and smart
Counseling
Organization provides family mediation, supervised visitation, supprot groups, therapeutic interventions
Counseling
Child abuse prevention
Advocacy for abused and neglected children
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Juniors House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Caregiver Relief Program of Bedford. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds JUNIORS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN OF HOPE OF DEKALB COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CAREGIVER RELIEF PROGRAM OF BEDFORD ↗
- Who funds CASA WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE MONARCH ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds SHELBYVILLE COMMUNITY SOUP KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds BEDFORD COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Healing Trust Formerly Baptist Healing Hospital Trust · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bailey & Lucy Evans Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.