Skip to content
B-Giving Roetzel Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

B-Giving Roetzel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$60kHuman Services$43kCrime & Legal$38kHealth$25kPhilanthropy$15kFood & Nutrition$14kInternational$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROWLAND HALL$23,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
MILES OF FREEDOM$7,500
HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$3,000
CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER$3,000
SALT LAKE CITY MISSION$3,000
YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $3k → 8%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $3k → 8%Utah Foster Care: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
IL
NY
IA
PA
CA
UT
CO
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$139k · 7 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
21

Total granted

$139k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
0%

Still filing today

71%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RH
    ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $48k · revenue +59%
  • HC
    HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +105%
  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -13%
  • GP
    GLADIATOR PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -61%
  • LA
    LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
Utah Donor Collaborative

Democracy Means Equality, Freedom & Justice: It means having a representative government. UDC is here to transform Utah politics and ensure that every voice counts.

—
4
And Justice for All

Increase access to civil legal services for the disadvantaged in utah.

Crime & Legal
5
Honnold Foundation

Funding solar energy solutions, building capacity, and amplifying local leadership for those experiencing the greatest impacts from climate change, economic instability, and social injustice.

Environment
6
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
7
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
8
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
10
Patient Access Network Foundation

As a leading charitable foundation and healthcare advocacy organization, the pan foundation is dedicated to accelerating access to treatment for those who need it most and empowering patients on their healthcare journeys. we provide…

—
11
Utah World Trade Center

World trade center utah accelerates growth for utah companies through our global networks, programs, and services.

Community Improvement
12
Hispanic Access Foundation

Hispanic access foundation connects latinos and others to partners and opportunities to improve lives and create an equitable society.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Asfaw Family Foundation International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
12/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RMHC OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN AREA INC: $19,000 · OtherRMHC OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN AREA INCCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY INC: $15,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TETON VALLEY…Individual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUTAH FOOD BANK: $6,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKGLADIATOR PROJECT: $5,000 · OtherGLADIATOR PROJECTMEALS ON WHEELS: $5,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSSALT LAKE CITY MISSION: $3,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,500 · Other+8 more: $8,000 · Other+8 moreROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL: $48,000 · EducationROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOLWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $10,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR …MILES OF FREEDOM: $32,500 · Crime & LegalMILES OF FREEDOMLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE: $5,000 · Crime & LegalLEGAL AID SOCIETY O…+1 more: $1,000 · Crime & LegalHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $13,000 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANC…Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $10,000 · HealthRonald McDona…The Fistula Foundation: $2,500 · HealthThe Fistula F…Midtown Community Health Center Inc: $2,000 · HealthMidtown Commu…Crossroads Urban Center: $5,500 · Human ServicesUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $2,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalPERUVIAN HEARTS: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$71,500Education$58,000Crime & Legal$38,500Health$27,500Human Services$15,000International$10,000Youth Development$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL: $48,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMILES OF FREEDOM: $32,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCrossroads Urban Center: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLADIATOR PROJECT: $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLEGAL AID SOCIETY OF SALT LAKE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPERUVIAN HEARTS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDRENS RIGHTS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidtown Community Health Center Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOLT INITIATIVE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Asfaw Family Foundation International: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetThe Other Side Academy: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS FREEDOM NETWORK: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH VALLEY ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George S and Dolores …The Ashton Family Fou…Kennecott Utah Copper…Lawrence & Janet Dee …Sorenson Legacy Found…The Community Foundat…Dominion Energy Chari…Gs Donor Advised Phil…American Endowment Fo…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…
George S and Dolores Dore Eccles FoundationUT15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · The Ashton Family Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B-Giving Roetzel Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B-Giving Roetzel Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to B-Giving Roetzel Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to B-Giving Roetzel Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on B-Giving Roetzel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home