Skip to content

· Private foundation

B E a Family Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$199k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$266kEducation$264kHuman Services$228kInternational$31kArts & Culture$26kPublic Benefit$22kPhilanthropy$17kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $26k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $162k
$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMAGINEIF LIBRARY FOUNDATION$162,250
INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDRENS SERVICES$25,728
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,500
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC$1,160
PALADIN CONSERVANCY INC$1,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$1,000
AMERICAN FUND FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION$1,000
PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$850
MERCY CHEFS$550
HUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA$500
SALVATION ARMY$500
BIGFORK ACES INC$500
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$500
MAYO CLINIC$400
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $36k → 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $240 → 14%MERCY CHEFS: $550 → 20%INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $30k → 9%DELIVERFUND: $12k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $200 → 14%MERCY CHEFS: $100 → 20%INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDRENS SERVICES: $26k → 9%DELIVERFUND: $10k → 14%INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $23k → 9%INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $21k → 9%INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $21k → 9%INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $20k → 9%INTERMOUNTAIN CHILDREN'S HOME: $12k → 9%CHILD BRIDGE: $14k → 18%CHILD BRIDGE: $7k → 18%CHILD BRIDGE: $2k → 18%CHILD BRIDGE: $1k → 18%CHILD BRIDGE: $1k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
PA
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$636k · 39 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
27

Total granted

$636k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+30%

Still filing today

54%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KR
    KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
    2× · 2019–2021 · $105k · revenue +68%
  • LH
    LOGAN HEALTH - WHITEFISH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $101k · revenue +17%
  • D
    DeliverFund
    3× · 2018–2021 · $31k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • KR
    KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue +27%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR A BETTER BIGFORK
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • TC
    THE CRU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
7
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
8
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
9
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
Researchamerica

2025 was a turbulent year for the medical and health research community, but our commitment to advocating for science never wavered. from pushing back against funding threats to elevating researchers' voices and equipping advocates, we…

—
12
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation

The mission of the akc canine health foundation, inc. is to fund, advance, and communicate canine health research and science through knowledge and discovery.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
27/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Intermountain Childrens Home: $189,701 · Human ServicesIntermountain Childrens HomeDeliverFund: $30,900 · Human ServicesDeliverFundCHILD BRIDGE INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesCHILD BRIDGE INC+2 more: $1,090 · Human ServicesKALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $105,000 · HealthKALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL …LOGAN HEALTH - WHITEFISH: $100,575 · HealthLOGAN HEALTH - WHITEFISH+9 more: $6,309 · HealthCRU MINISTRIES: $62,150 · OtherCRU MINISTRIESBIGFORK THEATER: $25,500 · OtherBIGFORK THEATERFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15,982 · OtherFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNI…FLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · OtherFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNI…Individual grant recipient: $9,520 · Other+46 more: $55,915 · Other+46 moreFLATHEAD LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $162,250 · EducationFLATHEAD LIBRARY FOUN…+3 more: $6,700 · EducationKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $29 · PhilanthropySTAND UP AMERICA INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsFLATHEAD LAKERS INC: $2,300 · Environment
Human Services$245,691Health$211,884Other$179,567Education$168,950Philanthropy$45,029Civil Rights$20,000Environment$2,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIntermountain Childrens Home: $189,701 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetFLATHEAD LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $162,250 over 1y, 12% of budgetKALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $105,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOGAN HEALTH - WHITEFISH: $100,575 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetDeliverFund: $30,900 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCHILD BRIDGE INC: $24,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSTAND UP AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetFLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLATHEAD LAKERS INC: $2,300 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIGFORK ACES: $1,730 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,609 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALADIN CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WESTERN MONTANA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNADA Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $440 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LEGAL AND POLICY CENTER: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUSO FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF NW MONTANA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVESENDGO CHARITIES: $29 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Intermountain Childrens Home ↗
  • Who funds FLATHEAD LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KALISPELL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOGAN HEALTH - WHITEFISH ↗
  • Who funds KALISPELL REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DeliverFund ↗
  • Who funds CHILD BRIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FLATHEAD VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Stillwater Christian School ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLATHEAD LAKERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BIGFORK ACES ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds MONTANA FOOD BANK NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PALADIN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Whitefish Community Foundation IncMT21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Whitefish Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · James & Wanda Hollensteiner Fdn Lisa Mary Hollensteiner · Gianforte Family Charitable Trust · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Windmill Foundation Inc · Roundup for Safety Inc · Town Pump Charitable Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B E a Family Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B E a Family Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to B E a Family Inc?

Find your warmest path to B E a Family Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on B E a Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph