Skip to content

· Private foundation

B & D Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$524kEducation$172kRecreation & Sports$110kHuman Services$72kYouth Development$57kPhilanthropy$55kInternational$45kCommunity Improvement$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$693k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL$50,000
MANAWA REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE$15,000
LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
LIONS PRIDE ENDOWMENT FUND OF WI$8,500
LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
STURM HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION$6,000
MANAWA COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER$5,000
MANAWA AREA FOOD PANTRY$3,000
ST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL$3,000
ST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL$3,000
WISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION$1,800
UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ST JOSEPH'S RESIDENCE INC$1,500
ZION EV LUTHERAN CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS: $5k → 10%WISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION: $47k → 10%CAMP LUTHER: $25k → 12%LIONS PRIDE ENDOWMENT FUND OF WI: $9k → 10%CAMP LUTHER: $25k → 12%STURM HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%LIONS PRIDE ENDOWMENT FUND OF WI: $8k → 10%STURM HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%LIONS PRIDE ENDOWMENT FUND OF WI: $8k → 10%STURM HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $6k → 10%LIONS PRIDE ENDOWMENT FUND OF WI: $5k → 10%LIONS PRIDE ENDOWMENT FUND OF WI: $5k → 10%LIONS PRIDE ENDOWMENT FUND OF WI: $5k → 10%LIONS PRIDE ENDOWMENT FUND OF WI: $5k → 10%ST JOSEPH'S RESIDENCE INC: $23k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $65k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $50k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $50k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $50k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $50k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $50k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $50k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $50k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $50k → 11%MANAWA REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE: $15k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15k → 11%MANAWA REVITALIZATION COMMITTEE: $13k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $8k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 11%MANAWA AREA VETERANS FREEDOM PARK: $5k → 11%MANAWA AREA VETERANS FREEDOM PARK: $5k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $5k → 11%MANAWA AREA VETERANS FREEDOM PARK: $5k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $5k → 11%LITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 11%MANAWA AREA VETERANS FREEDOM PARK: $5k → 11%MANAWA AREA VETERANS FREEDOM PARK: $5k → 11%MANAWA AREA VETERANS FREEDOM PARK: $5k → 11%ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $5k → 11%MANAWA COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 27 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
5

Total granted

$1.1M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+75%

Still filing today

19%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +4%
  • LP
    Lions Pride Endowment Fund Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $46k · revenue +1%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH RESIDENCE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • EE
    EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +75%
  • MA
    Manawa Athletic Booster Club Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -89%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Natural Resource Development Association Inc

The natural resource development association supports policies that lead to proper, necessary, and conscientious resource development and conservation. by engaging community leaders, laborers, manufacturers, and job creators in the…

Environment
2
Waukesha County Land Conservancy Inc

To protect environmentally senstive land in waukesha county wisconsin

Environment
3
Milwaukee Audubon Society Inc

Protect and restore Wisconsin's natural heritage and ecology through active leadership, education and stewardship

Environment
4
Eagle River Chain of Lakes Association Inc

It is the mission of the organization to maintain, protect, and improve the quality of the lakes and connecting waterways of the eagle river chain of lakes in vilas county wisconsin.

Environment
5
Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin

Eagles Nest Projects Wisconsin is a nonprofit educational organization whose primary purpose is to inspire and educate youth through hands-on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs focused on aviation. The…

Education
6
Friends of the Parks of Pewaukee

To promote the continued development of parks and recreation activites through the contributions of organizations or individuals from the community.

Recreation & Sports
7
Wisconsin Veteran's Village Association Inc

Provide affordable housing, support, and community to veterans throughout their lifespan.

Housing & Shelter
8
Southern Wisconsin Land Conservancy

Dedicated to working with land owners to protect conservation-worthy land and natural resources of southern wisconsin.

Environment
9
Wisconsin Wildlife Federation Inc

The wisconsin wildlife federation has a dual mission to engage in conservation education and to advocate for sound conservation policy.

Environment
10
Owasco Lake Watershed Management Council Inc

To coordinate actions for protecting and restoring the health of owasco lake and its watershed to ensure that owasco lake will serve as a source of public drinking water, a recreational asset, an economic driver, and an important natural…

Environment
11
Wisconsin Lions Birch-Sturm Memorial Fund Inc

To provide financial support from time to time to further certain of the exempt purposes of the wisconsin lions foundation, inc.

Human Services
12
Southeast Wisconsin Land Conservancy

Obtain and manage land of ecological significance.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lions Pride Endowment Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Manawa Area Veterans Freedom Park Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOL: $410,000 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH AND SCHOOLLITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOL: $118,000 · OtherLITTLE WOLF HIGH SCHOOLST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $80,000 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCHCAMP LUTHER INC: $50,000 · OtherSTURM HUMANITARIAN FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $42,200 · OtherMANAWA COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER: $35,000 · Other+20 more: $177,191 · Other+20 moreLions Pride Endowment Fund Inc: $45,500 · PhilanthropyManawa Area Veterans Freedom Park Inc: $40,000 · PhilanthropyWISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $54,700 · Community ImprovementEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $5,000 · HealthWAUPACA COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC: $4,830 · Recreation & SportsManawa Athletic Booster Club Inc: $2,500 · Youth Development
Other$957,391Philanthropy$85,500Community Improvement$54,700Health$5,000Recreation & Sports$4,830Youth Development$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION INC: $54,700 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetLions Pride Endowment Fund Inc: $45,500 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetManawa Area Veterans Freedom Park Inc: $40,000 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetST JOSEPH RESIDENCE INC: $31,775 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWAUPACA COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC: $4,830 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetIOLA LIVING ASSISTANCE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetManawa Athletic Booster Club Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISCONSIN LIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Lions Pride Endowment Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds Manawa Area Veterans Freedom Park Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH RESIDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL EQUESTRIANS COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds WAUPACA COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IOLA LIVING ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Manawa Athletic Booster Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION OF ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region IncWI15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization B & D Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from B & D Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to B & D Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to B & D Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on B & D’s filings →

    More from the funding graph