Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ayh Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2021
11
Grants FY2021
3
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Religion$226kPhilanthropy$65kInternational$40kEducation$27kEnvironment$20kAnimals$10kCrime & Legal$10kHuman Services$4kOther$0
02FY2021 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $126k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$43,257
YESHIVAT MAHARAT$25,000
DARKHEI NOAM$18,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SAR ACADEMY$10,000
MEDICAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE$10,000
MASS AUDUBON$10,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$5,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$5,000
JEWISH CONTENT INC$1,800
ROMEMU$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MASS AUDUBON: $10k → 8%SOUTH PHILADELPHIA SHTIEBEL: $10k → 22%BNAI DAVID JUDEA: $10k → 14%JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $5k → 6%JEWISH CONTENT INC: $2k → 14%FJC FOUNDATION: $350 → 17%YESHIVAT MAHARAT: $31k → 28%COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $2k → 14%YOUNG ISRAEL OF BOCA RATON: $3k → 11%SLIFKA CENTER: $2k → 12%HEBREW COLLEGE: $2k → 8%B'NAI DAVID JUDEA: $10k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $43k → 17%YESHIVAT MAHARAT: $30k → 28%HILLEL INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $30k → 14%PRESSMAN ACADEMY: $5k → 14%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $5k → 17%YESHIVAT MAHARAT: $25k → 28%NETWORK FOR THE GOOD: $250 → 14%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $5k → 17%YESHIVAT MAHARAT: $25k → 28%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $5k → 17%SAR ACADEMY: $10k → 28%FOOD BANK OF NYC: $180 → 17%SAR ACADEMY: $10k → 28%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $2k → 17%DARKHEI NOAM: $25k → 17%JCC: $5k → 17%DARKHEI NOAM: $18k → 17%WEST SIDE MIKVAH: $1k → 17%BEND THE ARC: $3k → 17%ROMEMU: $2k → 17%CHABAD LUBAVITCH AT THE WEST: $180 → 17%NYUS BRONFMAN CENTER FOR: $200 → 17%DARKHEI NOAM: $14k → 17%MEDICAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE: $10k → 17%DARKHEI NOAM: $3k → 17%BEIT RABBAN: $2k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FND: $25k → 17%BEIT RABBA: $750 → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS: $5k → 17%JEWISH CENTER-L JUNG MEMORIAL FUND: $500 → 17%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER INS: $3k → 17%HAZON: $12k → 17%HAZON: $8k → 17%HILLEL AT BARUCH: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
CT
CA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 68% of Ayh Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ayh Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$247k · 6 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
21

Total granted

$247k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-30%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
EducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YESHIVAT MAHARAT INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $111k · revenue -30%
  • DN
    DARKHEI NOAM
    4× · 2018–2021 · $60k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $20k

Funded once

  • HI
    HILLEL INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • SP
    SOUTH PHILADELPHIA SHTIEBEL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • J
    JCC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Judaism Foundation
—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
4
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
5
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
—
6
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Jersey Hills Section
—
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
9
The Jerusalem Connection
—
10
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
Sherit Isroel
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Funders Network; the most unlike its peers is Medical Justice Allianceinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DARKHEI NOAM: $59,509 · OtherDARKHEI NOAMHILLEL INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherHILLEL INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMY: $20,000 · OtherSALANTER AKIBA RIVERDALE ACADEMYHAZON INC: $19,600 · OtherHAZON INCMASS AUDUBON: $10,000 · OtherSOUTH PHILADELPHIA SHTIEBEL: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $33,430 · Other+17 moreYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $110,750 · EducationYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC+1 more: $1,800 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $43,257 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNAL FUNDPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUN…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $16,800 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FED…JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $5,000 · PhilanthropyNEW ISRAEL FUND: $10,000 · InternationalMEDICAL JUSTICE ALLIANCEINC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalJewish Content Inc: $1,800 · ReligionFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $180 · Community Improvement
Other$202,539Education$112,550Philanthropy$95,057International$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000Religion$1,800Community Improvement$180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAT MAHARAT INC: $110,750 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $43,257 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAZON INC: $19,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $16,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL JUSTICE ALLIANCEINC: $10,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Content Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT MAHARAT INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HAZON INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds MEDICAL JUSTICE ALLIANCEINC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL AT BARUCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Content Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ayh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ayh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ayh Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ayh Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ayh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph