Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Aw Dormeuil & R Dormeuil Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$520k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.8MPhilanthropy$1.6MRecreation & Sports$435kArts & Culture$342kEducation$123kHuman Services$70k
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $410k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$50,000
Sloan Kettering$50,000
DAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION$35,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$30,000
KATHONAH LEWISBORO BEDFORD SOFTBALL (KLBS)$30,000
Sloan Kettering$25,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$25,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$25,000
Sloan Kettering$25,000
HOLE IN THE WALL GANG$20,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$20,000
COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER$20,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$20,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF METRO NY$20,000
CROHNS & COLITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARCLUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $15k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%MARCLUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
OH
NJ
CT
TN
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.3M · 24 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against -12% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$4.3M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-12%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $900k · revenue +33%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +44%
  • CC
    CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $165k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • NH
    NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
3
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
4
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
7
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
11
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
12
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Sloan Kettering — $900,000 · OtherSloan KetteringDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATION — $225,000 · OtherDAVE THOMAS FOUNDATIONMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF METRO NY — $180,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF METRO NYTOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATION — $165,000 · OtherTOM COUGHLIN JAY FUND FOUNDATIONTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT — $93,000 · OtherPHELPS ASHIKARI ST JOHNS RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL — $60,000 · OtherST JOHNS RIVERSIDE HOSPITAL ASHIKARI BREAST CENTER FOUNDATION — $60,000 · Other+3 more — $95,000 · Other+3 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc — $900,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $150,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL IN…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $150,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION — $135,000 · HealthDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIA…+2 more — $35,000 · HealthSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $215,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYM…HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $135,000 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE …COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC — $70,000 · Recreation & SportsCOMMUNITY CE…KATONAH LEWISBORO BEDFORD SOFTBALL INC — $55,000 · Recreation & SportsKATONAH LEWI…MESERVE-KUNHARDT FOUNDATION — $123,000 · Arts & CultureJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC — $107,000 · Arts & CultureCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc — $102,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $10,000 · Arts & CultureMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $115,000 · Human ServicesMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC — $110,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,778,000Health$1,535,000Recreation & Sports$475,000Arts & Culture$342,000Human Services$115,000Philanthropy$110,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $900,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $215,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $165,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $150,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $150,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $135,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetDYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetMESERVE-KUNHARDT FOUNDATION — $123,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $115,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC — $110,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetJACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC — $107,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCaramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc — $102,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT — $93,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC — $70,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKATONAH LEWISBORO BEDFORD SOFTBALL INC — $55,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF KAREN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC
  • Who funds DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION INC DBA FAMILIAL DYSAUTONOMIA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MESERVE-KUNHARDT FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC
  • Who funds JACOB BURNS FILM CENTER INC
  • Who funds Caramoor Center for Music & the Arts Inc
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS STOREFRONT
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC
  • Who funds KATONAH LEWISBORO BEDFORD SOFTBALL INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KAREN INC
  • Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JOHN JAY HOMESTEAD

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY12× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Aw Dormeuil & R Dormeuil Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Montshire Museum of Science Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Aw Dormeuil & R Dormeuil Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Aw Dormeuil & R Dormeuil Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph