Skip to content

· Public charity

Autism & Rehabilitation Institute of New Jersey Incorporated

To promote and provide home and center based therapeutic and academic services for children affected by autism and other neurological issues

$88k
Granted FY2018
15
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Autism & Rehabilitation Institute of New Jersey Incorporated’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Donors Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Autism & Rehabilitation Institute of New Jersey Incorporated named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $88k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
10
’18
0
’19
0
’20
1
’21
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$397kReligion$40k
02FY2018 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
$2,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MESIVTA NEZER HATORAH$25,000
Individual grant recipient$14,000
YESHIVAS TORAS CHAIM$10,000
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA$8,500
YESIVA GEDOLA OF PATTERSON$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,100
Individual grant recipient$6,000
OROS BAIS YAAKOV$2,300
BAIS TOVA$1,500
BNOS MELECH$1,500
RABBI SOLOMON KLUGER SCHOOL$1,200
YESHIVA TORAS ARON$1,000
LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOLS$1,000
CONGREGATION OHR MEIR$450
BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 4% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%RABBI SOLOMON KLUGER SCHOOL: $1k → 20%DONORS FUND INC: $227k → 11%YESIVA GEDOLA OF PATTERSON: $8k → 12%YESHIVA MEOR HATALMUD: $6k → 20%DONORS FUND INC: $50k → 11%YESHIVA MEOR HATALMUD: $6k → 20%MESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $25k → 11%YESHIVA MEOR HATALMUD: $6k → 20%YESHIVA NESIVOS: $16k → 11%YESHIVA NESIVOS: $14k → 11%YESHIVA NESIVOS: $12k → 11%YESHIVAS TORAS CHAIM: $10k → 11%BAIS TOVA: $10k → 11%BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $9k → 11%CHEDER BNEI TORAH: $7k → 11%YESHIVA NESIVOS: $6k → 11%YESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC: $6k → 11%CHEDER BNEI TORAH: $6k → 11%MESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $5k → 11%OROS BAIS YAAKOV: $2k → 11%BAIS TOVA: $2k → 11%BNOS MELECH: $2k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS ARON: $1k → 11%LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOLS: $1k → 11%CONGREGATION OHR MEIR: $450 → 11%BAIS RIVKA ROCHEL: $150 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 5 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +52% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$120k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+52%

Still filing today

40%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2017–2020 · $48k
  • MN
    MESIVTA NEZER HATORAH
    2× · 2017–2018 · $30k · revenue +50%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2019 · $18k

Funded once

  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • BM
    BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA
    one grant, 2018 · $9k
  • YG
    YESIVA GEDOLA OF PATTERSON
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
2
Cheder Toras Zev

Cheder toras zev operates a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
3
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
4
Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc

Operation of a parochial grade school in lakewood, new jersey.

Education
5
Masores Bnos Yisroel Inc

Masores bnos yisroel is a religious elementary school providing quality education for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
6
Bais Shaindel

Bais shaindel is a religious girls high school in lakewood, nj, providing quality education for grades 9-12.

Education
7
Bais Yaakov Girls High School of Minneapolis

Providing jewish and secular education for high school aged girls.

Education
8
Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc

Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students

Education
9
Bais Kaila Torah Preparatory Hs

Educational-operation of private girls' high school

—
10
Ohr Avrohom Chaim Inc

Parochial elementary school in lakewood nj

Education
11
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
12
Yeshiva Tiferes Torah Inc

Yeshiva tiferes torah, inc. is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood, nj.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc; the most unlike its peers is Donors Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DONORS FUND INC: $277,389 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INCIndividual grant recipient: $48,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $18,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $12,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC: $10,000 · OtherYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INCBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $8,500 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHAYESIVA GEDOLA OF PATTERSON: $8,000 · OtherYESIVA GEDOLA OF PATTERSON+3 more: $1,800 · OtherMESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $30,000 · EducationMESIVTA NEZER…BAIS TOVA INC: $11,500 · EducationBAIS TOVA INCYESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC: $6,000 · EducationYESHIVA NESIV…CONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $2,300 · Education+3 more: $3,500 · Education+3 more
Philanthropy$277,389Other$106,900Education$53,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDONORS FUND INC: $277,389 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $30,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBAIS TOVA INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $2,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA NEZER HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds BAIS TOVA INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA NESIVOS HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds CONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds BNOS MELECH OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY21.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Donors Fund Inc · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Toras Chesed Inc · The Sorala Foundation · Tidewater Jewish Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Ruach Chaim Inc · Dirshu International Inc · Goldner Family Charity Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Autism & Rehabilitation Institute of New Jersey Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Autism & Rehabilitation Institute of New Jersey Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Bais Tova Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Mesivta Nezer Hatorah: 7% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Autism & Rehabilitation Institute of New Jersey Incorporated?

Find your warmest path to Autism & Rehabilitation Institute of New Jersey Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Autism & Rehabilitation Institute of New Jersey’s filings →

More from the funding graph