Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Austin Convention and Visitors Bureau

Promoting conventions, travel and tourism in and to the city of austin, and providing related services to convention attendees, travelers, and tourists.

$128k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Arts & Culture$1.1MPhilanthropy$40k
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $118k
$118,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRENCH LEGATION MUSEUM$118,000
HUSTON-TILLOTSON COLLEGE$10,365
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NEILL COCHRAN HOUSE MUSEUM: $15k → 10%AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $165k → 10%AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE: $116k → 10%FOUNDATION FOR THE PRESERVATION OF THE HISTORIC MILLETT OPERA HOUSE: $88k → 10%AUSTIN WOMAN'S CLUB: $59k → 10%AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE PARAMOUNT THEATRE CO: $58k → 10%AUSTIN WOMAN'S CLUB: $51k → 10%DOWNTOWN AUSTIN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION: $45k → 10%AUSTIN WOMAN'S CLUB: $30k → 10%PEASE PARK CONSERVANCY: $10k → 10%ST EDWARD'S UNIVERSITY: $45k → 10%BARTON SPRINGS CONSERVANCY: $50k → 10%BARTON SPRINGS CONSERVANCY: $45k → 10%FRIENDS OF DEEP EDDY INC: $40k → 10%THE CONTEMPORARY AUSTIN - LAGUNA GLORIA: $47k → 10%MAYFIELD PARKCOMMUNITY PROJECT: $38k → 10%THE CONTEMPORARY AUSTIN - LAGUNA GLORIA: $11k → 10%FRENCH LEGATION MUSEUM: $118k → 10%HUSTON-TILLOTSON COLLEGE: $18k → 10%JOURDAN-BACHMAN PIONEER FARMS: $47k → 10%HUSTON-TILLOTSON COLLEGE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$756k · 6 repeat orgs$416k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$756k
$298k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+49%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $118k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $339k · revenue +307%
  • AC
    Austin Club
    3× · 2019–2022 · $138k · revenue +44%
  • HU
    HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2021 · $28k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • PA
    PRESERVATION AUSTINgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $47k · revenue +511%
  • BS
    Barton Springs Conservancy
    one grant, 2018 · $45k · revenue -86%
  • SE
    St Edwards University
    one grant, 2017 · $45k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Austin Temple of Cao-Dai Tay-Ninh I
Religion
2
Shoal Creek Conservancy

The conservancy is dedicated to restoring, protecting and enhancing the ecological, social and cultural vibrancy of shoal creek in austin, texas, for the people of austin by engaging the public and partnering with the community, including…

Environment
3
Texas Society of Architects

Texas Society of Architects is the voice for Texas architecture, supporting the creation of safe, beautiful, sustainable environments.

4
Austin Creative Alliance

The mission of Austin Creative Alliance is to advance, connect, and celebrate Austin's arts, culture, and creative communities in order to nourish and strengthen the character, quality of life, and economic prosperity of our region.

Arts & Culture
5
Austin City Art Fund

To support the production and exhibition of art and film

Arts & Culture
6
Austin Public Library Friends Foundation

Support and strengthen austin public libraries

Education
7
Texas Association of Museums

The Texas Association of Museums strengthens the Texas museum community through collaborations, connections, professional development, and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
8
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
9
Austin History Center Association Inc

The Association supports the Austin History Center to achieve excellence in its efforts to serve as the collective memory of Austin and Travis County.

Arts & Culture
10
The Austin Area Commission for the Arts Inc

Austin area arts applauds and advances all arts by welcoming diverse, creative individuals to share their unique talents to inspire our community.

Philanthropy
11
Downtown Austin Parks Llc

The Downtown Austin Parks' mission is to create a vibrant, historic, and active spaces at the hear of Austin, Texas community through quality management of public space and creative programing that is based on historic relevance of…

Arts & Culture
12
Austin Creative Reuse

Fostering conservation and reuse through creativity, education, and community building.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Preservation Austin and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Deep Eddy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE — $338,500 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCEAustin Womans Club — $140,000 · Arts & CultureAustin Womans ClubDAUGHTERS OF THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS — $118,000 · Arts & CultureDAUGHTERS OF THE REPUBLIC OF TEXASTHE CONTEMPORARY AUSTIN MUSEUM INC — $58,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CONTEMPORARY AUSTIN MUSEUM INCPRESERVATION AUSTIN — $47,000 · Arts & CulturePRESERVATION AUSTIN+1 more — $14,740 · Arts & CultureAustin Club — $137,500 · OtherAustin ClubFRIENDS OF THE PARKS OF AUSTIN — $38,190 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE PARKS O…HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY — $28,365 · OtherHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVE…City of Austin — $23,500 · OtherCity of AustinPease Park Conservancy — $53,334 · Recreation & SportsPease Par…Barton Springs Conservancy — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsBarton Sp…St Edwards University — $45,000 · EducationDOWNTOWN AUSTIN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $45,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF DEEP EDDY INC — $40,057 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$716,240Other$227,555Recreation & Sports$98,334Education$45,000Environment$45,000Philanthropy$40,057

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAUSTIN THEATRE ALLIANCE — $338,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAustin Womans Club — $140,000 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetAustin Club — $137,500 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetDAUGHTERS OF THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS — $118,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY AUSTIN MUSEUM INC — $58,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPease Park Conservancy — $53,334 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPRESERVATION AUSTIN — $47,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBarton Springs Conservancy — $45,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSt Edwards University — $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF DEEP EDDY INC — $40,057 over 1y, 81% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY — $28,365 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL SOCIETY OF THE COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA — $14,740 over 1y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX29.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Greater Austin Performing Arts Center Inc · Better Business Bureau · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · The Moody Foundation · The Applied Materials Foundation · Austin Parks Foundation · Still Water Foundation · The Powell Foundation · St David's Foundation · The Summerlee Foundation · Ibm International Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Austin Convention and Visitors Bureau funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph