· Private foundation
Auriga Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $131k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $35,477 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Metro South | $25,500 |
| Red Cross of America | $25,000 |
| Salvation Army USA Eastern Territory | $15,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Fall River | $10,000 |
| Edvestors | $10,000 |
| Armenian Museum of America | $10,000 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell | $8,000 |
| Tunnels to Towers Foundation | $5,000 |
| Wounded Warrior Project | $5,000 |
| Armenian General Benevolent Union | $3,000 |
| The Charity Guild Inc | $2,600 |
| Save the Children | $2,000 |
| Boys & Girls Clubs of VolusiaFlagler Counties | $1,000 |
| Scituate Food Pantry | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GPGlobal Press Institute4× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +29%
- TBTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO SOUTH INC3× · 2023–2025 · $76k · revenue +13%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INCone grant, 2022 · $52k · revenue +3%
- BGBoys & Girls Club Metro Southone grant, 2021 · $20k
- BGBoys & Girls Club of Metro Southone grant, 2020 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the organization is to operate exclusively for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of, boys and girls clubs of america, a d.c. corporation that was congressionally chartered in 1956 ("boys & girls clubs of america")…
To enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
The mission of boys and girls clubs of greater washington is to help boys and girls of all backgrounds, especially those who need us most, build confidence, develop character and acquire the skills needed to become productive,…
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.
The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.
Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as caring, responsible, productive citizens.
Boys & girls clubs of boston (bgcb) stands as a transformative force in boston and chelsea, where high expectations unlock greatness. we believe that every young person who walks through our doors carries limitless potential. through our…
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To enable young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens. for more information visit www.boysandgirls.org.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Volusia Flagler and the most unlike its peers is Global Press Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Global Press Institute ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds EDVESTORS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROWEST INC ↗
- Who funds ARMENIAN MUSEUM OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS CHEW MEMORIAL BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHARITY GUILD INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER NEW BEDFORD INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds SCITUATE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds SCITUATE COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF VOLUSIA FLAGLER ↗
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Yawkey Foundation II · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Eastern Bank Foundation · Demoulas Foundation · Amelia Peabody Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Frank R Peters Trust · The Harborone Foundation · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Auriga Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell Inc — 27% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- The Charity Guild Inc — 10% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greater New Bedford Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
- Scituate Food Pantry Inc — 1% of income from government
- Edvestors Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.