Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

August G Barkow Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2018
8
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$3k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of August G Barkow Family Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year August G Barkow Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $7k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
17
6
18
1
19
0
20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Philanthropy$90kEducation$10kReligion$6kHealth$3kRecreation & Sports$575Human Services$100Environment$50Other$0
02FY2018 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$250
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIFESTRIDERS$2,720
HARVEST BIBLE CHAPEL$1,750
HARVEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$1,600
NORTH LAKE SAILING SCHOOL$250
Individual grant recipient$100
UNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL$100
PINE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL$75
KETTLE MORAINE GARDEN CLUB$50
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%MORGAN STANLEY GIFT FUND: $88k → 17%OLAF HARKEN MEMORIAL: $200 → 5%INLAND LAKE YACHTING ASSOCIATION: $250 → 10%JDRF: $2k → 17%LIFE STUDIES: $2k → 9%HARVEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $2k → 8%HARVEST BIBLE CHAPEL: $2k → 14%WILKINSON WOODS SENIOR COMMUNITY: $100 → 5%FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF WAUWATOSA: $100 → 17%LIFESTRIDERS: $3k → 5%LAKE COUNTRY LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 17%DIVINE REDEEMER: $4k → 5%UNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL: $400 → 5%DIVINE REDEEMER LUTHERAN: $100 → 5%UNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL: $100 → 5%PINE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL: $75 → 5%PLYC SILING SCHOOL: $2k → 5%KETTLE MORAINE GARDEN CLUB: $50 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $88,470 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCLAKE COUNTRY LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL — $6,200 · OtherLAKE COUNTRY LUTHERA…DIVINE REDEEMER — $4,100 · OtherDIVINE REDEEMERIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant rec…JDRF — $2,000 · OtherJDRFHARVEST BIBLE CHAPEL — $1,750 · OtherHARVEST BIBLE CHAPELHARVEST CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $1,600 · OtherHARVEST CHRISTIAN AC…PLYC SILING SCHOOL — $1,500 · OtherPLYC SILING SCHOOL+6 more — $1,000 · OtherLIFESTRIDERS INC — $2,720 · HealthUNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL INC — $500 · EducationPINE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC — $75 · Recreation & SportsKETTLE MORAINE GARDEN CLUB INC — $50 · Environment
Philanthropy$88,470Other$20,150Health$2,720Education$500Recreation & Sports$75Environment$50

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $88,470 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESTRIDERS INC — $2,720 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINLAND LAKE YACHTING ASSOCIATIONIN — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPINE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC — $75 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKETTLE MORAINE GARDEN CLUB INC — $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC
  • Who funds LIFESTRIDERS INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY LAKE SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds INLAND LAKE YACHTING ASSOCIATIONIN
  • Who funds PINE LAKE SAILING SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds KETTLE MORAINE GARDEN CLUB INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Windhover Foundation IncDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Windhover Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization August G Barkow Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph