Skip to content
Attic Trash and Treasure at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Attic Trash and Treasure

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Health$290kEducation$173kHuman Services$164kCrime & Legal$92kYouth Development$92kPhilanthropy$50k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$42,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$56k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE ROAD OUTREACH MISSION$42,000
BRAVE HEART LOUISIANA-CHILDREN IN NEED INC$42,000
THE ARC BATON ROUGE$42,000
BATON ROUGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$42,000
ST LILLIAN ACADEMY$42,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%THE ARC BATON ROUGE: $50k → 19%THE ARC BATON ROUGE: $42k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$536k · 6 repeat orgs$325k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$536k
$241k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ALZHEIMER'S SERVICES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k
  • TA
    THE ARC BATON ROUGE
    2× · 2024–2025 · $92k · revenue -31%
  • SL
    ST LILLIAN ACADEMY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $92k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • CA
    CAPITAL AREA CASA ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +11%
  • LM
    Louisiana Mental Health Association
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -11%
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Baton Rouge Crisis Intervention Center

To offer prevention, intervention and postvention services that provide support in times of crisis and reduce the impact of suicide, homicide and violence.

Health
2
Orleans County Child Advocacy Center Inc
Health
3
Childrens Advocacy Center - Hope House

To provide a child-oriented, multidisciplinary forensice interview enviroment facility and counseling center for victims of abuse and their families.

Civil Rights
4
Louisiana Center for Children's Rights

Using direct representation and advocacy, we fight to keep children out of the justice system so that they can thrive in their homes and communities.

Crime & Legal
5
The Bridge Center for Hope

The mission of the Bridge Center is to provide pathways to treatment for people experiencing behavioral health issues and to link providers to create an integrated continuum of care from prevention to rehabilitation.

Health
6
The Arc of Louisiana

The arc of louisiana advocates for and with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.

—
7
Baton Rouge Area Alcohol and Drug Center Inc

BRAADC offers a lifeline to adult men and women suffering with substance abuse/addiction through providing non-medical detoxification services to anyone entering voluntarily.

—
8
East Baton Rouge Truancy Assessment Inc

To identify children who have exhibited truant tendencies, to assess the causal problems for these children and to provide support services.

Crime & Legal
9
Casa - New Orleans

Casa - new orleans trains volunteers to become court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children in the juvenile justice system.

—
10
Center for Family and Youth Services

Agency delivers outpatient mental health counseling to at risk youth and families in St. Charles Parish, Louisiana.

Human Services
11
Batesville Area Resource Center Inc

To establish a community center to provide a clearinghouse of low or no cost resources to those underserved in the service area.

Human Services
12
The Arc Eau Claire Inc

To promote the general welfare of the mentally retarded and to foster development of programs and encourage research on their behalf.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baton Rouge Children's Advocacy Center; the most unlike its peers is Providence Road Outreach Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALZHEIMER'S SERVICES: $100,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S SERVICESREDEMPTORIST ST GERARD SCHOOL: $80,000 · OtherREDEMPTORIST ST GERARD SCHOOLLA PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · OtherLA PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATIONLouisiana Mental Health Association: $50,000 · OtherLouisiana Mental Health AssociationST VINCENT DE PAUL: $50,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAULBRAVE HEART LOUISIANA-CHILDREN IN NEED INC: $42,000 · OtherBRAVE HEART LOUISIANA-CHILDREN IN NEED INCGRIEF RECOVERY CENTER: $30,000 · OtherGRIEF RECOVERY CENTERCANCER SERVICES OF GREATER BATON ROUGE: $30,000 · OtherCANCER SERVICES OF GREATER BATON ROUGEProvidence Road Outreach Mission: $92,000 · Youth DevelopmentProvidence Road O…BATON ROUGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $42,000 · Youth DevelopmentBATON ROUGE CHILD…ST LILLIAN ACADEMY: $92,000 · EducationST LILLIAN A…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationTHE ARC BATON ROUGE: $92,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC BATO…CAPITAL AREA CASA ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · Civil RightsBATON ROUGE REGIONAL EYE BANK INC: $30,000 · Health
Other$462,000Youth Development$134,000Education$93,000Human Services$92,000Civil Rights$50,000Health$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARC BATON ROUGE: $92,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetST LILLIAN ACADEMY: $92,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetProvidence Road Outreach Mission: $92,000 over 2y, 45% of budgetCAPITAL AREA CASA ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetLouisiana Mental Health Association: $50,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetBATON ROUGE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $42,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGRIEF RECOVERY CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetBATON ROUGE REGIONAL EYE BANK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetThrive Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Huey & Angelina W…Baton Rouge Area Foun…Capital Area United W…Inner Wheel of Baton …The Merice Boo Johnst…Shell USA Company Fou…Sparkhound Foundation…The Credit Bureau of …Blue Cross & Blue Shi…Albemarle FoundationArthur J Gallagher Fo…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Huey & Angelina Wilson FoundationLA24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Huey & Angelina Wilson Foundation · Baton Rouge Area Foundation · Capital Area United Way · Inner Wheel of Baton Rouge · The Merice Boo Johnston Grigsby Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Sparkhound Foundation Inc · The Credit Bureau of Baton Rouge Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Attic Trash and Treasure funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Attic Trash and Treasure. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Attic Trash and Treasure’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home