How much did ATP TOUR INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of ATP TOUR INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

youth at-riskat-risk neighborhoods

2021

—

2022

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$250k+1 grant · $443k

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$518M

Total assets

Largest grants

ATP TOUR CHARITIES INC$443,100
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION$15,000
WTA FOUNDATION INC$10,000
HIGH IMPACT ATHLETES INC$8,357

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 44% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Champions Fund Inc

Our mission is to simplify charitable giving among pro athletes and sport-related charities for the benefit of their communities.

Philanthropy

Professional Tennis Registry Foundation

Making the sport of tennis available to everyone. utilizing the sport of tennis to engage and improve the lives of children teens, adults and people with disabilities. builing character and confidence through the sport of tennis

—

Match Point Impact Inc

Using the platform of tennis to impact Players Parents Donors and Coaches by training them up in the way that they should go so that when they are older they will not depart from it

Religion

Charlotte Tennis Association

CTA provides a full range of tennis programs and activities for people of all ages, abilities and backgrounds and creates opportunities to enjoy the social, physical and health benefits provided by the sport of tennis.

—

Pro Athletes Outreach

Pro Athletes Outreach exists to unite a community of pro athletes and couples to grow as disciples of Jesus and positively impact their spheres of influence.

Religion

Florida Tennis Foundation

To provide world-class tennis opportunities to deserving young people.

Recreation & Sports

United States Professional Tennis Association

The uspta, inc.'s purpose is to raise the standards of tennnis teaching as a profession and to increase the interest and awareness of tennis to the general public.

—

Techsgiving Inc

Provide tools and exposure to underrepresented youth to reach their full potential in the tech industry.

Arts & Culture

Greater Houston Volleyball Association

Training and support of texas tornados volleyball club players

Recreation & Sports

United States Tennis Association-

Growing tennis to inspire healthier people and communities every.

—

Global Trust Partners

The mission of Global Trust Partners is empowering national workers and building trust in churches and ministries to grow local generous giving to Gods work.

Religion

Karuna Foundation

Supporting the wellbeing of animals, our natural environment and all global citizens.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atp Tour Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Champions Volunteer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

12/12

Grantees still filing

10/12

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,610,048International$100,000Recreation & Sports$75,351Philanthropy$48,357Public Safety & Disaster$20,000Environment$20,000Youth Development$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ATP TOUR INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ATP TOUR CHARITIES INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~334 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 19.8× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 593046932 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ATP TOUR CHARITIES INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 334 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Atp Tour Inc?

Find your warmest path to Atp Tour Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ATP TOUR INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Atp Tour Inc?

More from the funding graph

ATP TOUR INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

12 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Atp Tour Inc?

More from the funding graph