· Public charity
Atp Tour Inc
To serve men's professional tennis worldwide by showcasing the greatest players at the best tournaments, to entertain millions of fans around the globe, and inspire the next generation of fans and players.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $496,457 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $952,057 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $455,600 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $250k+1 grant · $443k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ATP TOUR CHARITIES INC | $443,100 |
| CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| WTA FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| HIGH IMPACT ATHLETES INC | $8,357 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 35% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $393k on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions, $126k to organizations and $267k to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: OPERATIONAL SUPPORT · GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: OPERATIONAL SUPPORT · GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
Stated purpose: GENERAL SUPPORT
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +402% since the first grant, against +46% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ATATP TOUR CHARITIES INC7× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue ×20 · 100% of their budget
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2023 · $110k · revenue -40%- MWMaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc3× · 2019–2022 · $75k · revenue -1%
Funded once
- GFGreenaction for Health and Environmental Justiceone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -26%
ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +129%- TGTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Using the platform of tennis to impact Players Parents Donors and Coaches by training them up in the way that they should go so that when they are older they will not depart from it
The org. is a section of the united states tennis assoc. and is dedicated to carrying out the goals of the national assoc. within its region, particularly with respect to promoting tennis opportunities for juniors and adults of all…
To serve men's professional tennis worldwide by showcasing the greatest players at the best tournaments, to entertain millions of fans around the globe, and inspire the next generation of fans and players.
The junior tennis foundation, inc. (the foundation) was organized as a not-for-profit entity for the following purposes: to operate exclusively for the promotion of amateur sports competition, to promote the development of tennis amongst…
Our mission is to simplify charitable giving amoung pro athletes and sport related charities for the benefit of their communities.
The women's coaching alliance is on a mission to develop female leaders through coaching youth sports.
The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…
Clean Tomorrow advances policies that reduce climate emissions by turning policy ambition into action. We work to catalyze rapid change that will accelerate the innovation and growth of clean energy.
Baltimore Action Legal Team is dedicated to pursuing creative, community-driven solutions and movement-oriented lawyering to support the Baltimore community.
Usa badminton will foster the growth of badminton in the united states of america and competitive excellence by u.s. athletes in international and olympic competition.
The mission of the organization is to educate the general public regarding issues of public policy and to promote and bring about advances in such areas of public policy. the organization promotes public policy change through education,…
The gbta foundation was established to catalyze action in the global business travel industry around creating a positive impact and better future for people and the planet by driving and funding initiatives that foster sustainability,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wta Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Champions Volunteer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ATP TOUR CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MaliVai Washington Kids Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice ↗
- Who funds HIGH IMPACT ATHLETES INC ↗
- Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE OCEAN CLEANUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOUSTON TENNIS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH AREA TENNIS PATRONS INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHAMPIONS VOLUNTEER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOU CAN PLAY ↗
- Who funds WTA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Atp Tour Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Atp Tour Inc?
Find your warmest path to Atp Tour Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.