· Private foundation
Atlantic Pacific Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $101k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| St Jude Palm Beach | $43,570 |
| University of Miami School of Busin | $22,500 |
| Urban Land Institute | $20,000 |
| United Way Miami | $15,000 |
| Greater Miami Jewish Federation | $5,360 |
| University of Central Florida | $5,000 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters of Miami | $5,000 |
| Young Musicians Unite Inc | $5,000 |
| United States Sailing Center Inc | $5,000 |
| Florida International University | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| S FL Regional Prosperity | $2,500 |
| Greater Ft Laud Chamber | $2,500 |
| Jewish National Fund | $1,800 |
| Essential2Life Inc | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $52k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUniversity of Miami School of Busin4× · 2022–2025 · $80k
- ULUrban Land Institute2× · 2023–2025 · $28k
- FSFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC3× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- KLKESHER LD INC KESHERone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +11%
- IIICON Israeli Collaberation Netone grant, 2023 · $10k
- AAATLANTA AEROTROPOLIS ALLIANCE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Food bank for nyc has been the city's major hunger-relief organization driven by our mission to empower every new yorker to achieve food security for good. we harness the collective power of our network of food providers, partners, and…
Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.
None
To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…
Dedicated to alleviating hunger through acquisition and distribution of food and grocery products, community education to the causes and consequences of hunger, and meaningful action on behalf of people in need of food.
Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…
Together with our partners, we provide healthy solutions to end hunger in our community.
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
Develop solutions to end hunger through food banking, public policy and innovation.
To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding South Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Exchange for Change Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MUSICIANS UNITE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES SAILING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KESHER LD INC KESHER ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA AEROTROPOLIS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Lauren's Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
- Who funds MATT AND LISA ALLEN FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Shores Youth Athletic Club Inc ↗
- Who funds Exchange for Change Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mary Hall Freedom Village Inc ↗
- Who funds UFAR ANIMALS RESCUE CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Miami Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Atlantic Pacific Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Feeding South Florida Inc — 5% of income from government
- Young Musicians Unite Inc — 0% of income from government
- Lauren's Kids Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Atlantic Pacific Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Atlantic Pacific Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.