Skip to content
Atlanta Track Club Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Atlanta Track Club Inc

Atlanta track club is a member-based organization centered around running that delivers world-class events, training programs, and community outreach activities to the metro atlanta area.

$145k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0174% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$332kPublic Safety & Disaster$204kRecreation & Sports$88kCivil Rights$51kHuman Services$21kHealth$13kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $145,411 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $135,411 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Piedmont Park Conservancy$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ATLANTA MISSION: $5k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $5k → 13%ATLANTA MISSION: $5k → 13%BACK ON MY FEET ATLANTA: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $83k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions, all to individuals. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$81k · 98% · 16 people

Stated purpose: PRIZE MONEY

East Asia and the Pacific$2k · 2% · 1 person

Stated purpose: PRIZE MONEY

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 6 repeat orgs$540k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$428k
$540k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-7%
+39%

Still filing today

50%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V5
    VARIOUS 5000 OR LESS
    4× · 2017–2020 · $234k
  • GM
    GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $104k
  • PP
    Piedmont Park Conservancy Inc
    3× · 2018–2024 · $48k · revenue +140%

Funded once

  • AP
    ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $325k
  • AP
    ATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +3%
  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $51k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc

The mission of the atlanta community food bank is to engage, educate and empower our community to fight hunger. our bold goal is to see that all people in our service area have access to the nutritious meals they need when they need them.

Food & Nutrition
2
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

—
3
Atlanta Track Club Inc

Atlanta track club is a member-based organization centered around running that delivers world-class events, training programs, and community outreach activities to the metro atlanta area. we encourage and inspire both youth and adults to…

Recreation & Sports
4
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
5
Usa Football Inc

Usa football's mission is to lead, strengthen and grow football for all. as the sport's governing body, usa football authors and delivers best-in-class resources and standards for every family member to pursue and enjoy america's favorite…

Recreation & Sports
6
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
7
Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
8
Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce Inc

The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…

—
9
Atlanta Hall Management Inc

To inspire and entertain by celebrating the passion and traditions of college football and its greatest players and coaches.

Arts & Culture
10
Atlanta Neighborhood Development Partnership Inc

To develop, finance, and advocate for affordable housing at scale that promotes racial equity and healthy communities where families thrive.

Housing & Shelter
11
American Culinary Federation Inc

Promoting excellence, education, professionalism and collegiality in the culinary profession

—
12
Acfb Support Organization Inc

Acfb support organization, inc., is operated exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes and/or activities of atlanta community food bank, inc., a georgia nonprofit corporation.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Usa Track & Field Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $324,545 · OtherATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLSVARIOUS 5000 OR LESS: $234,410 · OtherVARIOUS 5000 OR LESSGRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $104,013 · OtherGRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITALPiedmont Park Conservancy Inc: $47,500 · OtherPiedmont Park Conservancy Inc+2 more: $25,235 · OtherATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Crime & LegalATLANTA POL…NATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $51,269 · Arts & CultureUSA Track & Field Inc: $40,000 · Recreation & SportsBACK ON MY FEET: $11,180 · Human ServicesATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $10,318 · Human ServicesEMORY GROUP RETURN: $12,500 · EducationINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $7,000 · Education
Other$735,703Crime & Legal$100,000Arts & Culture$51,269Recreation & Sports$40,000Human Services$21,498Education$19,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetATLANTA POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $51,269 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPiedmont Park Conservancy Inc: $47,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUSA Track & Field Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMORY GROUP RETURN: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $11,180 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION: $10,318 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY: $5,138 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Atlanta Track Club Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atlanta Track Club Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Food for Lane County: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Atlanta Track Club’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home