Skip to content
Atlanta Beltline Partnership Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Atlanta Beltline Partnership Inc

The organization fulfills, protects and preserves the atlanta beltline vision by raising funds and building partnerships that enable the project, engage the public and empower the residents of surrounding neighborhoods.

$42M
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$42M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$90MRecreation & Sports$6.0MHousing & Shelter$2.3MArts & Culture$1.8MPublic Benefit$614kHealth$138kEnvironment$100kFood & Nutrition$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $86k
  • $250k+1 grant · $42M
$49,605
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATLANTA BELTLINE INC$42,139,892
ATLANTA BELTLINE INC$49,605
FULTON TAX COMMISSIONER$36,706
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TRULY LIVING WELL CENTER: $30k → 13%ATLANTA CONTACTPOINT INC: $30k → 13%GIRLS ON THE RUN OF ATLANTA: $30k → 13%ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $30k → 13%WHOLISTIC STRESS CONTROL INSITUTE: $100k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $42.1M → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $34.3M → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $6.9M → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $6.0M → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $2.3M → 13%FULTON TAX COMMISSIONER: $2.1M → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $1.6M → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $1.1M → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $1.1M → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $564k → 13%FULTON TAX COMMISSIONER: $361k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $255k → 13%FULTON COMMISSIONERS OFFICE: $254k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $244k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $216k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $214k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $212k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $211k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $188k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $157k → 13%FULTON TAX COMMISSIONER: $128k → 13%GEORGIA CONSERVANCY: $100k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $77k → 13%ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $50k → 13%FULTON TAX COMMISSIONER: $37k → 13%FULTON TAX COMMISSIONER: $31k → 13%GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORP: $30k → 13%GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORP: $8k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101M · 3 repeat orgs$674k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$101M
$674k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+65%
+78%

Still filing today

33%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    ATLANTA BELTLINE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98M
  • FT
    FULTON TAX COMMISSIONER
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2.7M
  • GM
    GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $38k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • FC
    FULTON COMMISSIONERS OFFICE
    one grant, 2021 · $254k
  • WS
    WHOLISTIC STRESS CONTROL INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +130%
  • GC
    GEORGIA CONSERVANCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +103%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Georgia Health Care Association Inc

The primary exempt purpose is to educate, provide information, and provide services to employees and owners of member organizations.

—
2
Dunwoody Nature Center Inc

Inspires the love of nature and cultivates environmental understanding and stewardship by: (1)Conserving and enhancing Dunwoody Park (2)Educating children, families and adults of all ages about the natural world and our place in…

Environment
3
Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce Inc

The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…

—
4
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
5
Greater Oconee County Chamber of Commerce

To encourage healthy business development through developing leaders

—
6
Georgia Humanities Council Inc

Georgia humanities connects people and communities to encourage understanding and inspire hope.

Arts & Culture
7
Greater Macon Chamber of Commerce

To promote business, economic development, and community development within the greater macon area.

—
8
Georgia Interfaith Power & Light Inc

Georgia Interfaith Power and Light (GIPL) inspires and equips communities of faith to organize, implement practical climate solutions, and advocate across Georgia on issues of climate change, environmental justice, and community resilience.

Environment
9
South Fulton Institute Inc

South Fulton Arts is a regional catalyst for the advancement of the arts, education, and environment that enriches lives and communities.

—
10
Corporate Volunteer Council of Atlanta

Cvc of atlanta encourages corporate members to develop excellence in corporate volunteerism. develop programs and provide resources.

Community Improvement
11
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

—
12
Family Counseling Center of Central Georgia Inc

Strengthen and preserve the well-being of individuals, couples, and families through easy, affordable access to professional counseling services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hammonds House Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATLANTA BELTLINE INC: $97,792,284 · OtherATLANTA BELTLINE INC+3 more: $3,034,387 · OtherGEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC: $100,000 · EnvironmentTruly Living Well Ctr for Natural Urban: $30,000 · EnvironmentHAMMONDS HOUSE MUSEUM INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureGRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $38,000 · HealthATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionATLANTA CONTACTPOINT INC: $30,000 · Recreation & SportsGirls on the Run Georgia Inc: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$100,826,671Environment$130,000Arts & Culture$100,000Health$38,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Recreation & Sports$30,000Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHOLISTIC STRESS CONTROL INSTITUTE: $100,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHAMMONDS HOUSE MUSEUM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetGRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $38,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA CONTACTPOINT INC: $30,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTruly Living Well Ctr for Natural Urban: $30,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Atlanta Beltline Partnership Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atlanta Beltline Partnership Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Atlanta Beltline Partnership’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home