Skip to content
Association of University Radiologists at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Association of University Radiologists

To promote research, education, and scholarship in academic radiology.

$421k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.8MHealth$1.1MEmployment$140k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $980
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $420k
$70,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$8.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL INC$70,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$70,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER$70,000
UCLA PAYMENT SOLUTIONS & COMPLIANCE$70,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$70,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND$70,000
Individual grant recipient$980
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL INC: $70k → 16%TRUSTESS OF UNIVSITY OF PENN: $70k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $70k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $70k → 10%UCLA PAYMENT SOLUTIONS & COMPLIANCE: $70k → 14%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $70k → 17%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $70k → 10%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $70k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $70k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $70k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $70k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $70k → 9%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY RADIOLOGISTS RESEARCH AN: $86k → 7%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $70k → 19%BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL INC: $70k → 16%TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVA: $70k → 22%STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $70k → 8%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $70k → 10%UC REGENTS PAYMENT SOLUTIONS & COMPLIANCE: $70k → 14%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $70k → 17%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $70k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $70k → 8%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $70k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $70k → 9%Association of University Radiologists Research an: $82k → 7%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $70k → 19%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL RESEARCH: $70k → 16%UC REGENTS PAYMENT SOLUTIONS & COMPLIANCE: $70k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $70k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $70k → 9%AUR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $70k → 19%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $70k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $70k → 9%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY RADIOLOGISTS Research an: $27k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $70k → 19%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $70k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $70k → 9%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $70k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL RESEARCH: $18k → 16%MASSACHUSETTES GENERAL HOSPITAL: $70k → 16%MASSACHUSETTES GENERAL HOSPITAL: $70k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL RESEARCH: $70k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
UT
CO
MD
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 16 repeat orgs$402k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$3.2M
$262k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+46%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $141k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2025 · $280k · revenue +51%
  • EU
    Emory University
    4× · 2017–2024 · $280k · revenue +80%
  • WF
    WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $140k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • EU
    EMORY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $70k
  • RU
    REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2022 · $70k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $70k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
Washington University

The washington university is a co-educational, nondenominational university with a long and distinguished history of teaching, research and (cont'd on schedule o)

Education
4
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
7
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
8
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
9
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
10
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
11
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
12
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Johns Hopkins University; the most unlike its peers is Association of University Radiologists Research an. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $420,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $280,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $228,489 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $210,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $140,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $140,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND: $140,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLANDWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $140,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversEMORY UNIVERSITY: $70,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $70,000 · OtherUCLA PAYMENT SOLUTIONS & COMPLIANCE: $70,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER: $70,000 · Other+2 more: $52,491 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITY: $280,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYEmory University: $280,000 · EducationEmory UniversityASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY RADIOLOGISTS RESEARCH AN: $223,252 · EducationASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY RADIOLOGISTS RESEARCH…WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $140,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCESTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $140,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAUNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $140,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATIONJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $140,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $140,000 · EducationLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITYTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $140,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JU…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $70,000 · EducationTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $140,000 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $140,000 · Health
Other$2,030,980Education$1,693,252Health$280,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $280,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $280,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY RADIOLOGISTS RESEARCH AN: $223,252 over 4y, 53% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES: $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $140,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $140,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY: $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY RADIOLOGISTS RESEARCH AN ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF UTAH RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of University Radiologists funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of University Radiologists. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Association of University Radiologists’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home