Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Association of the United States Navy Fu

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$164kHuman Services$22kArts & Culture$12k
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$863k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$2,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$2,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
REGENT UNIVERSITY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS$2,000
HARDING UNIVERSITY$2,000
LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY$2,000
EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY$2,000
WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PEMBROKE$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$2,000
NC STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $2k → 12%DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY: $2k → 6%DICKINSON COLLEGE: $2k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $2k → 11%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $2k → 10%POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA: $2k → 9%USS THE SULLIVANS: $12k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $2k → 14%SOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $2k → 16%HARDING UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $2k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN - ANN ARBOR: $2k → 14%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2k → 14%AUBURN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS: $2k → 15%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $2k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $2k → 12%LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $2k → 14%NC STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%UNC-CHAPEL HILL: $2k → 13%HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA PEMBROKE: $2k → 26%BYU: $2k → 8%SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $2k → 27%CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 9%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%GONZAGA UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 11%ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY INC: $10k → 6%LONGWOOD UNIVERSITY: $6k → 20%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 16%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%ILLNOIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY INC: $9k → 6%ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY INC: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$94k · 13 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
27

Total granted

$94k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+12%

Still filing today

23%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $22k · revenue -21%
  • CU
    CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $11k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +12%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
3
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
4
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
5
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

6
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
7
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
8
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
11
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
12
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Illinois Wesleyan University and the most unlike its peers is Association of the United States Navy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 81 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%79%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%86%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
21/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY INC — $21,500 · OtherASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY INCIndividual grant recipient — $11,919 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLEMSON UNIVERSITY — $11,000 · OtherCLEMSON UNIVERSITYARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY — $8,000 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYLONGWOOD UNIVERSITY — $8,000 · OtherLONGWOOD UNIVERSITYILLNOIS STATE UNIVERSITY — $7,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $6,000 · Other+35 more — $76,000 · Other+35 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $11,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $4,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGECORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $4,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIV…HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · EducationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITYKALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $2,000 · EducationILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationDICKINSON COLLEGE — $2,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,000 · EducationEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 · EducationPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $2,000 · EducationCedarville University — $2,000 · EducationSOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 · Education+4 more — $4,000 · Education+4 more
Other$149,419Education$48,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY INC — $21,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGENT UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITWORTH UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarding University Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINGATE UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PORTLAND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY INC
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE
  • Who funds REGENT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ILLINOIS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds WHITWORTH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DICKINSON COLLEGE
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds POINT LOMA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Association of the United States Navy Fu funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology26% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc2% of income from government
  • University of Portland2% of income from government
  • Southern Nazarene University1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Association of the United States Navy Fu?

Find your warmest path to Association of the United States Navy Fu through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph