· Public charity
Association of State & Territorial Public Health Nutrition Directors
Membership organization to promote optimal nutritional status of all americans
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $40,450 |
| CENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDS | $38,381 |
| NORTH DAKOTA DEPT OF HEALTH | $28,333 |
| WORTH HIGGINS & ASSOCIATE | $15,993 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
17 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- NCNOURISH COLORADO4× · 2020–2023 · $245k · revenue +115%
SHELBURNE FARMS4× · 2020–2023 · $244k · revenue +50%- FMFRESHFARM MARKETS4× · 2020–2023 · $242k · revenue +114%
Funded once
- MSMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY BOARDone grant, 2021 · $71k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $71k
- OHOREGON HEALTH AUTHORITYone grant, 2021 · $59k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
To improve the health of the environment and communities by advancing organic regenerative agriculture to grow ecological resilience, economic viability and socially just futures for kentucky farmers through educational, technical and…
Support the development and enhancement of sustainable farming systems through farmer-to-farmer networking, innovation, demonstration, and education.
He fondy food center connects greater milwaukee to local, fresh food- from farm to market to table - so that children learn better, adults live healthier, and communities celebrate cultural food traditions.
Dairy management inc (dmi) was formed in 1995 by the national dairy promotion and research board (ndb) and the united dairy industry association (udia). dmi is a management organization that invests dairy producer checkoff funds in…
The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…
Marbleseed educates, inspires, and empowers farmers to thrive in a sustainable, organic system of agriculture.
Founded in 2007, sierra harvest is building a community that values and eats an abundance of fresh, local, seasonal food; training successful local farmers that are increasing sustainable food production; and creating equitable access to…
The nasda foundation is the only educational and research organization that directly serves the nation's state departments of agriculture. we are a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. our mission is to enhance american food and agricultural…
The non-gmo project offers trustworthy education to the public and provides verification services to consumer brands and retailers with the purpose of empowering people to care for themselves, the planet, and future generations.
How this is measured
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NOURISH COLORADO ↗
- Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
- Who funds FRESHFARM MARKETS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY STEWARDSHIP ↗
- Who funds Burr Oak 4-H Club - Michigan State ↗
- Who funds OHIO HEAD START ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds HEALTH PARTNERS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds KIDS FORWARD INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: WK Kellogg Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Association of State & Territorial Public Health Nutrition Directors funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of State & Territorial Public Health Nutrition Directors. Bigger dots raise more.
- Postpartum Support International: 43% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms: 3% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Association of State & Territorial Public Health Nutrition Directors’ filings →