· Public charity
Association of International Certified Professional Accountants
Be the most influential body of professional accountants in the world.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL CERTIFIED PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANTS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $58,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $65,319 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,819 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OUT FOR UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS CONFERENCE INC | $16,000 |
| THE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION | $12,500 |
| NABA - NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACCOUNTANTS INC | $10,000 |
| CPA SOCIETY EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| NCPACA FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 94% of Association of International Certified Professional Accountants’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 25% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +52% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACCOUNTANTS INC5× · 2019–2024 · $99k · revenue +269%
- AIAscend Inc4× · 2019–2023 · $53k · revenue +117%
- AFALPFA FOUNDATION INC3× · 2019–2021 · $50k · revenue ×94
Funded once
- ABAICPA BENEVOLENT FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +52% · 39% of their budget
- WIWESTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITYone grant, 2020 · $15k
- VRVALUE REPORTING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -55%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The american institute of certified public accountants is a membership organization whose primary exempt purposes are to serve and unite the accountancy profession, to develop and maintain high professional standards, to advance the…
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
To elevate the profession that transforms lives through the power of financial planning.
Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…
Helping members achieve success in the profession of accountancy and taxation.
Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.
The mission of Beta Alpha Psi, the premier international honor and service organization for financial and business information students and professionals, is to inspire and support excellence by: encouraging the study and practice of…
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
The macpa provides professional development, regulatory, promotional and advocacy services to its members, supporting their efforts to conform to high standards of professional service and conduct.
American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…
We are a community of cpas and financial professionals cultivating authentic relationships, unique learning experiences, and purposeful advocacy for our future.
To empower cpas and related professionals to drive value as trusted business advisors by fostering professional excellence and integrity, building community and advocating for members and those they serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Massachusetts Society of Cpa's Inc and the most unlike its peers is Finman Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AICPA BENEVOLENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds American Accounting Association ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK ACCOUNTANTS INC ↗
- Who funds BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS OF AMERICA-GROUP ↗
- Who funds Ascend Inc ↗
- Who funds ALPFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DECA PREP INC ↗
- Who funds CPA SOCIETY EXECUTIVES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FUTURE BUSINESS LEADERS OF AMERICA GROUP RETURN ↗
- Who funds OUT FOR UNDERGRADUATE BUSINESS CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds VALUE REPORTING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY OF CPA'S INC ↗
- Who funds National HBCU Business Deans Roundtable Inc ↗
- Who funds NCPACA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Finman Corp ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Association of International Certified Professional Accountants funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.