Skip to content
Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundation

As the philanthropic arm of the association of diabetes care & education specialists, the adces foundation provides vital support for the association by allocation of funds for research and creating professional development and recognition opportunities for diabetes care and education specialists.

$74k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$264kScience & Tech$141kEducation$96k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $57,950, the rows itemized in this filing. The $73,707 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,757 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$693k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LA-YD MRF$50,000
T-1 TODAY$7,950
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $20k → 15%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $46k → 10%BEHAVIORAL DIABETES INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LA-YD MRF: $50k → 14%ICAHN MT SINAI: $20k → 17%AUNT BERTHA A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $50k → 10%ARCARE: $5k → 23%INNOVATIVE MEDS RX INC: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $50k → 8%T-1 TODAY: $8k → 12%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 12%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $30k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $15k → 19%COOS COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH SVC: $10k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $35k → 10%WESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $35k → 8%T-1 TODAY: $8k → 12%ANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $15k → 8%T-1 TODAY: $8k → 12%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $12k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
OH
PA
CA
UT
MD
AZ
AR
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$290k · 4 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$290k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+28%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $81k · revenue +7%
  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    3× · 2021–2023 · $55k · revenue +31%
  • TT
    T-1 TODAY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $24k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • AB
    AUNT BERTHA A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mount Sinai Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $130,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHAUNT BERTHA A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $50,209 · OtherAUNT BERTHA A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATIONUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONABOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $16,000 · OtherBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $10,000 · OtherINNOVATIVE MEDS RX INC: $10,000 · OtherAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $55,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospit…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $50,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesT-1 TODAY INC: $23,865 · HealthT-1 TODAY INCTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $20,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITALCoos County Family Health Services Inc: $10,000 · HealthCoos County Family Health Services Inc+2 more: $10,000 · Health+2 moreVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $81,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSI…
Other$251,209Health$168,865Education$81,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $81,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetT-1 TODAY INC: $23,865 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoos County Family Health Services Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARCARE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home