Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundation

As the philanthropic arm of the association of diabetes care & education specialists, the adces foundation provides vital support for the association by allocation of funds for research and creating professional development and recognition opportunities for diabetes care and education specialists.

$74k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of ASSOCIATION OF DIABETES CARE & EDUCATION AND RESEARCH FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $57,950 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $73,707 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,757 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$693k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LA-YD MRF$50,000
T-1 TODAY$7,950
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $20k → 15%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $46k → 10%BEHAVIORAL DIABETES INSTITUTE: $5k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LA-YD MRF: $50k → 14%ICAHN MT SINAI: $20k → 17%AUNT BERTHA A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $50k → 10%ARCARE: $5k → 23%INNOVATIVE MEDS RX INC: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $50k → 8%T-1 TODAY: $8k → 12%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $16k → 12%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $30k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $15k → 19%COOS COUNTY FAMILY HEALTH SVC: $10k → 13%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $35k → 10%WESTERN UNIVERSITY HEALTH: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $35k → 8%T-1 TODAY: $8k → 12%ANN & ROBERT LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $15k → 8%T-1 TODAY: $8k → 12%ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $12k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $10k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $8k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
OH
PA
CA
UT
MD
AZ
AR
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$290k · 4 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$290k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+28%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $81k · revenue +7%
  • Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
    3× · 2021–2023 · $55k · revenue +31%
  • TT
    T-1 TODAY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $24k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • AB
    AUNT BERTHA A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • TM
    THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
    one grant, 2023 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
4
Mount Sinai Health System Inc

The mission of the mount sinai health system is to provide compassionate patient care with seamless coordination and to advance medicine through unrivaled education, research, and outreach in the many diverse communities we serve.

Human Services
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mount Sinai Hospital and the most unlike its peers is Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $130,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHAUNT BERTHA A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION — $50,209 · OtherAUNT BERTHA A PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATIONUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA — $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONABOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY — $16,000 · OtherBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $15,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKINNOVATIVE MEDS RX INC — $10,000 · OtherWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $10,000 · OtherAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $55,000 · HealthAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospit…Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $50,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los AngelesT-1 TODAY INC — $23,865 · HealthT-1 TODAY INCTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $20,000 · HealthTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITALCoos County Family Health Services Inc — $10,000 · HealthCoos County Family Health Services Inc+2 more — $10,000 · Health+2 moreVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $81,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSI…
Other$251,209Health$168,865Education$81,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $81,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetT-1 TODAY INC — $23,865 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCoos County Family Health Services Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARCARE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Association of Diabetes Care & Education and Research Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph