· Public charity
Association for Community Affiliated Plans
The ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY AFFILIATED PLANS (acap) is the national trade association which represents not-for-profit safety net health plans.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $82,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $85,731 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,231 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KEEP AMERICANS COVERED | $60,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH POLICY | $15,000 |
| THE NATIONAL ACADEMY FOR STATE HEALTH POLICY | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 6% of Association for Community Affiliated Plans’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -64% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFTHE FAIRNESS PROJECT5× · 2018–2022 · $135k · revenue +424%
- NANational Association of Medicaid Directors6× · 2017–2023 · $55k · revenue +112%
NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE3× · 2017–2019 · $24k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- ATABLE TO INCone grant, 2018 · $50k
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICAone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To accelerate the nation's progress towards safe, efficient, high - quality health care and the improved health status of the american population.
The association represents and advocates for home health agencies, hospices, and home care providers across the united states. it advances high quality, accessible home based care through federal and regulatory advocacy, professional…
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
Empower self-care by preserving and expanding choice and availability of consumer healthcare products.
The american college health association (acha) serves as the principal leadership organization for advancing the health of college students and campus communities through advocacy, education, and research.
Consumer Health Coalition (CHC) is dedicated to inspiring a consumer movement to advance the health and enhance access to quality and affordable healthcare. We further our mission by targeting populations that are at risk for experiencing…
Fair health is a national independent, not-for-profit corporation whose mission is to supply objective, unbiased information for all stakeholders to improve healthcare quality, access and affordability.
To provide a united voice for people with chronic diseases and disabilities.
Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
The National Association of Chronic Disease Directors (NACDD) is a national public health association of chronic disease directors. Its mission is to improve the health of the public by strengthening state-based leadership and expertise…
To develop and advance public policy that controls costs and improves access and delivery of quality health care to medicaid members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Health Policy Development and the most unlike its peers is National Association of Medicaid Directors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE FAIRNESS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Health Policy ↗
- Who funds KEEP AMERICANS COVERED ↗
- Who funds National Association of Medicaid Directors ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COALITION ON HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE ↗
- Who funds DAVID A WINSTON HEALTH POLICY FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY DEVELOPMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Commonwealth Fund · Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc · California Healthcare Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · AARP
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Association for Community Affiliated Plans funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.