Skip to content

· Private foundation

Asg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$184k
Granted FY2022
20
Grants FY2022
6
States reached
$90k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Asg Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Asg Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $184k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’17
8
’18
11
’19
10
’20
17
’21
14
’22
2
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.4MReligion$386kEducation$109kHealth$62kInternational$46kYouth Development$16kHousing & Shelter$15kFood & Nutrition$4kOther$0
02FY2022 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k17 grants · $56k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $38k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIVEKANANDA VEDANTA SOCIETY OF CHICAGO$90,000
UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$25,000
FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE$12,600
HINDU TEMPLE OF GREATER CHICAGO$7,452
CHINMAYA MISSION$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$5,000
VEDANTA CENTER OF GREATER WASHINGTON$5,000
HAND IN HAND USA$5,000
APNA GHAR$5,000
IAMA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,000
GIANT STEPS$5,000
JACKSON PARK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$4,500
VEDANTA SOCIETY OF NEW YORK$2,500
WORLD CENTER KITCHEN INC$2,000
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$1,825
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
MA
RI
CA
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$633k · 21 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
27

Total granted

$633k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+9%

Still filing today

57%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $32k · revenue +87%
  • GS
    Giant Steps Illinois Inc
    4× · 2018–2022 · $20k · revenue +24%
  • HI
    Hand in Hand USA
    5× · 2017–2022 · $18k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • HI
    HEAL INDIA
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -6%
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +2%
  • AI
    AIMS INDIA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akanksha Education Fund Inc

To support educational opportunities for underserved children in india, and raising support for and awareness of such activities in the united states.

International
2
India Foundation

Healthcare and education for the needy

Human Services
3
Intelehealth Inc

Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…

International
4
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Kaival Gyan Chicago Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Upaya Social Ventures

Upaya Social Ventures' mission is to create dignified jobs for people living in extreme poverty by building scalable businesses with investment and consulting support.

International
7
Indiaspora

Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.

Human Services
8
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
10
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
11
Shiv Nadar Foundation

Shiv Nadar Foundation provides access to higher education tounderprivileged students and funds to other charitable organizations to supporteducation, research, social policies for women empowerment, affordable healthcareservices, medical…

Education
12
India Development and Relief Fund Inc

Provide social development and relief assistance to underprivileged people primarily in india but also in nepal, sri lanka and the usa

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is India Development Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $3,382,057 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM+2 more: $6,100 · PhilanthropyVIVEKANANDA VEDANTA SOCIETY OF CHICAGO: $168,101 · OtherVIVEKANANDA V…VIVEKANANADA VEDANTA SOCIETY: $154,853 · OtherVIVEKANANADA …THE HINDU TEMPLE OF GREATER CHICAGO: $29,859 · OtherTHE HINDU TEM…Individual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIAMA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $18,300 · Other+31 more: $91,716 · Other+31 moreUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $50,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $32,400 · EducationGiant Steps Illinois Inc: $20,000 · EducationCOLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationAUGUSTINE LITERACY PROJECT - TRIANGLE: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationHand in Hand USA: $17,500 · HealthJACKSON PARK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $16,300 · HealthAcus Foundation: $8,000 · Health+3 more: $1,750 · HealthHEAL INDIA: $10,000 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $9,490 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 · InternationalTASSEL INC: $5,000 · International+1 more: $130 · InternationalCHINMAYA MISSION CHICAGO: $14,500 · ReligionSANATANA DHARMA FOUNDATION INC: $501 · ReligionAPNA GHAR INC: $14,500 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$3,388,157Other$487,829Education$117,900Health$43,550International$30,620Religion$15,001Housing & Shelter$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $3,382,057 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC: $32,400 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGiant Steps Illinois Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHand in Hand USA: $17,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetJACKSON PARK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $16,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS: $14,700 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHINMAYA MISSION CHICAGO: $14,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAPNA GHAR INC: $14,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHEAL INDIA: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCOLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $9,490 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAcus Foundation: $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSewa International Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndia Development Service: $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetDANDELION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR THE CAROLINAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Bernard Hospital: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANATANA DHARMA FOUNDATION INC: $501 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE READING GROUP: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNZIKANI BENEVOLENT FOUNDATION: $130 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Giant Steps Illinois Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hand in Hand USA ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON PARK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds CHINMAYA MISSION CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds APNA GHAR INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAL INDIA ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF DUPAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds Acus Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AIMS INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTINE LITERACY PROJECT - TRIANGLE ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
  • Who funds TASSEL INC ↗
  • Who funds India Development Service ↗
  • Who funds DANDELION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL19.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Asg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Asg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Asg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Asg’s filings →

More from the funding graph