Skip to content
Asbury Foundation of Hattiesburg Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Asbury Foundation of Hattiesburg Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$873
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$873
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$34MFood & Nutrition$2.7MHuman Services$2.0MRecreation & Sports$1.1MReligion$968kHealth$693kCommunity Improvement$476kPhilanthropy$435kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$873
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EDWARDS STREET MISSION$873
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 24%MISSION AT THE CROSS: $155k → 18%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $325k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $250k → 15%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $145k → 15%MISSION AT THE CROSS: $54k → 18%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $111k → 15%MISSION AT THE CROSS: $51k → 18%HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN: $100k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$41M · 26 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
13

Total granted

$41M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+24%

Still filing today

58%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JONES COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2019–2023 · $7.1M · revenue +111%
  • WC
    William Carey University
    6× · 2017–2022 · $3.9M · revenue +111%
  • HO
    HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $931k · revenue +75%

Funded once

  • DD
    DYNAMIC DYSLEXIA DESIGN3D SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +24%
  • AR
    ABBIE ROGERS CIVITAN CAMP ENDOWMENT FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $231k · revenue -68% · 58% of their budget
  • DS
    DUBARD SCHOOL FOR LANGUAGE DISORDER
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Methodist Foundation of Mississippi Inc

The foundation exists to cultivate and administer current and deferred gifts for the benefit of ms united methodist related institutions, agencies, local churches, and other ministries for charitable purposes and support and to educate…

Religion
2
Christian Community Foundation of Memphis

The foundation exists to build god's kingdom by serving donors in the mid-south as they seek to provide resources for god's work in our community and throughout the world.

Philanthropy
3
Mississippi State University Alumni Association

To promote annual giving to provide funds for services to mississippi state university alumni.

Education
4
United Methodist Volunteers in Miss Ion Southeastern Jurisdictioninc

To connect and coordinate united methodist volunteers and their christian friends with persons in need of humanitarian assistance and spiritual encouragement.

Religion
5
Wesley Foundation At Mississippi State University Inc

To nurture discipleship during crucial college years by offering students opportunities for worship, study, missions, leadership, fellowship, and support.

Religion
6
Jobs for Mississippi Graduates Inc

Jmg's mission is to keep young people in school through graduation and provide work-based learning experiences that will lead to career advancement opportunities or to enroll in a postsecondary institution that leads to a rewarding career.

—
7
Our Mississippi Foundation
Community Improvement
8
Working Together Mississippi

Seeking to build relationships with diverse institutions around the state to build the power to effect political change in a non-partisan way while strengthening the institutions we engage with to help execute their institution's mission…

Education
9
Mercy Housing & Human Development

Empowered by the belief that all people have basic rights to dignity and compassion, our mission at mercy housing and human development is to recognize the need for sustainable, affordable housing for low-wealth families of south…

Human Services
10
Mississippi Society for Disabilities Incorporated

To provide a broad spectrum of programs and program services to meet the needs of mississippi children and adults with disabilities, thus enabling them to achieve maximum independence and gain the greatest quility of life.

—
11
Women's Foundation of Mississippi

To improve the lives of women & girls by promoting social change & economic self-sufficiency through advocacy & strategic grantmaking.

Human Services
12
University of Mississippi Medical Center Research Development Foundation

Support the research activities of the university of mississippi medical center

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Southern Mississippi Wesley Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Area Development Partnership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILLIAM CAREY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $8,500,000 · OtherWILLIAM CAREY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONJONES COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,051,537 · OtherJONES COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI: $6,650,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPIPEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $6,200,000 · OtherPEARL RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGEWilliam Carey University: $3,925,000 · OtherWilliam Carey University+20 more: $5,578,634 · Other+20 moreHOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC: $931,000 · Human ServicesTHE MISSION THE CROSS: $260,154 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC ABUSE FAMILY SHELTER INC: $99,068 · Human Services+1 more: $25,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $585,900 · EducationDYNAMIC DYSLEXIA DESIGN3D SCHOOL: $250,000 · Education+1 more: $25,000 · EducationMOUNT OLIVE MINISTRIES INC: $632,628 · Crime & LegalEXTRA TABLE FEEDS INC: $575,000 · Food & NutritionMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $365,000 · HealthKIDS HUB: $80,976 · HealthCENTER FOR PREGNANCY CHOICES OF S C MS: $70,893 · HealthTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MS INC: $400,000 · PhilanthropyREAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$37,905,171Human Services$1,315,222Education$860,900Crime & Legal$632,628Food & Nutrition$575,000Health$516,869Philanthropy$435,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJONES COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $7,051,537 over 4y, 21% of budgetWilliam Carey University: $3,925,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetHOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC: $931,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetChristian Services Inc of America: $900,000 over 7y, 28% of budgetMOUNT OLIVE MINISTRIES INC: $632,628 over 7y, 36% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $585,900 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetEXTRA TABLE FEEDS INC: $575,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MS INC: $400,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED: $365,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetArea Development Partnership Inc: $328,000 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetTHE MISSION THE CROSS: $260,154 over 3y, 22% of budgetDYNAMIC DYSLEXIA DESIGN3D SCHOOL: $250,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetABBIE ROGERS CIVITAN CAMP ENDOWMENT FUND: $231,359 over 1y, 58% of budgetHATTIESBURG TOURISM COMMISSION: $107,564 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE FAMILY SHELTER INC: $99,068 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetKIDS HUB: $80,976 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY: $76,490 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR PREGNANCY CHOICES OF S C MS: $70,893 over 1y, 29% of budgetMISSION MISSISSIPPI: $50,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetREAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPINEBELT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JONES COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds William Carey University ↗
  • Who funds HOMES OF HOPE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Services Inc of America ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT OLIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EXTRA TABLE FEEDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHEAST MS INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI CHARTERED ↗
  • Who funds Area Development Partnership Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI WESLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MISSION THE CROSS ↗
  • Who funds DYNAMIC DYSLEXIA DESIGN3D SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ABBIE ROGERS CIVITAN CAMP ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds HATTIESBURG TOURISM COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE FAMILY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS HUB ↗
  • Who funds MISSISSIPPI CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR PREGNANCY CHOICES OF S C MS ↗
  • Who funds MISSION MISSISSIPPI ↗
  • Who funds REAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mississippi State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PINEBELT FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pinebelt FoundationMississippi Power Fou…Ergon Foundation IncWarren A Hood Jr Fami…Community Foundation …Louis Lou Ann and Mel…The United Way of Sou…Van Devender Family F…Century Club Charitie…Feild Co-Operative As…Mapp Family FoundationGulf Coast Community …
Pinebelt FoundationMS26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pinebelt Foundation · Mississippi Power Foundation Inc · Ergon Foundation Inc · Warren A Hood Jr Family Foundation · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Louis Lou Ann and Melissa Poynter Family Foundation · The United Way of Southeast Ms Inc · Van Devender Family Foundation William Van Devender Trustee · Century Club Charities Inc · Feild Co-Operative Association · Mapp Family Foundation · Gulf Coast Community Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Asbury Foundation of Hattiesburg Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asbury Foundation of Hattiesburg Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Asbury Foundation of Hattiesburg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home