· Private foundation
Asath Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k46 grants · $87k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $154k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Congregation Gates of Mercy | $48,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $38,500 |
| Yeshivas Radin | $27,000 |
| BMG Student Aid Fund | $10,000 |
| Keren Olam Hatorah | $10,000 |
| Daat Torah | $10,000 |
| Beth Medrash Govoha of America Ttfy | $10,000 |
| Meoros Bais Yaakov | $6,500 |
| BJJ Hachnosas Kallah Fund | $5,000 |
| Mesores Hatorah | $5,000 |
| Shiras Chaim | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| Khal Chassidim of Westgate | $4,500 |
| Cong Lutzk | $4,250 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.
50 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- ATA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange2× · 2021–2022 · $15k · revenue +94%
- LCLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC4× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +14%
- TFTZUR FOUNDATION INC2× · 2019–2024 · $6k · revenue +149%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2018 · $20k
- KHKEREN HAIR ZICHRON YISROELone grant, 2017 · $20k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $18k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.
Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.
To conduct and maintain a religious school in accordance with the tenets, traditions and precepts of the orthodox jewish faith.
Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.
Maintain communal and charitable affairs in accordance with the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
The purpose of this organization is to support indigent torah scholars and their families by providing stipends and additional funds at jewish holiday times.
To provide religious Jewish education.
Providing jewish education to high school age students.
To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith
How this is measured
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 129 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · The Sorala Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jdh Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Gemach of Jackson Inc · Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Asath Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asath Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Bnos Melech of Lakewood Inc: 21% of income from government
- Mesoras Hatorah Inc: 11% of income from government
- Yeshiva Tiferes Torah Inc: 3% of income from government
- Nachlas Bais Yaakov: 2% of income from government
- Meoros Bais Yaakov Inc: 2% of income from government
- Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Asath’s filings →