Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arthur M Robinson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$154kHuman Services$134kYouth Development$90kReligion$70kFood & Nutrition$41kHealth$13kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $56k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$792k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADOPTION OPTIONS$12,000
CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION$12,000
CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY$12,000
SALESIAN SOCIETY$10,000
HANNA BOYS CENTER$10,000
FOOD FOR THOUGHT DENVER$5,000
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$2,500
FEEDING AMERICA$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $104k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OPERATION FAMILY FUND: $10k → 18%OPERATION FAMILY FUND: $10k → 18%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $2k → 14%ADOPTION OPTIONS: $12k → 12%ADOPTION OPTIONS: $10k → 12%ADOPTION OPTIONS: $10k → 12%ADOPTION OPTIONS: $10k → 12%ADOPTION OPTIONS: $10k → 12%ADOPTION OPTIONS: $10k → 12%ADOPTION OPTIONS: $10k → 12%ADOPTION OPTIONS: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 11 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
6

Total granted

$496k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+179%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    ADOPTION OPTIONS
    8× · 2018–2025 · $82k · revenue +8%
  • CO
    Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $42k · revenue +62%
  • FF
    Food For Thought Denver
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +179%
  • AR
    ANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
3
Clif Family Foundation
Philanthropy
4
San Francisco Family Foundation
—
5
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
6
Community Food Share Inc

To eliminate hunger in boulder and broomfield counties through engagement, collaboration and leadership.

Food & Nutrition
7
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
8
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
9
Cfp Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Cancer Foundation Inc

The cancer foundation's mission is to alleviate the financial burden of cancer.

Health
11
The Sam Simon Feeding Families Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Chance for Life

Chance for life's mission is to raise awareness and funds for critical research and clinical trials for pediatric cancer in the united states of america.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Operation Enduring Freedom Family Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMY: $92,000 · OtherCHICAGO JESUIT ACADEMYHANNA BOYS CENTER: $90,000 · OtherHANNA BOYS CENTERSALESIAN SOCIETY: $70,000 · OtherSALESIAN SOCIETYOPERATION FAMILY: $30,000 · OtherOPERATION FAMILYSALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherSALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL+4 more: $10,000 · OtherADOPTION OPTIONS: $82,000 · Human ServicesADOPTION OPTIONSOPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM FAMILY FUND: $20,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION ENDURING FRE…+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $42,000 · EducationChildren of Fal…Food For Thought Denver: $27,500 · EducationFood For Though…Feeding America: $13,500 · Food & NutritionPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$312,000Human Services$103,500Education$69,500Food & Nutrition$13,500Health$9,000Philanthropy$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADOPTION OPTIONS: $82,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetChildren of Fallen Patriots Foundation: $42,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFood For Thought Denver: $27,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM FAMILY FUND: $20,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetFeeding America: $13,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $9,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ADOPTION OPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds Children of Fallen Patriots Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Food For Thought Denver ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM FAMILY FUND ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTHONY RIZZO FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arthur M Robinson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arthur M Robinson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arthur M Robinson’s filings →

More from the funding graph