Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arthur & Edith Pearson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$418k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.0MArts & Culture$428kPhilanthropy$300kRecreation & Sports$201kCommunity Improvement$194kAnimals$102kYouth Development$68kReligion$67kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $285k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $102k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$8.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY$52,000
BOTTINEAU AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
THEODORE ROOSEVELT MEDORA FOUNDATION$35,000
NEWBURG UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT$30,000
WESTHOPE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP$30,000
WESTHOPE PUBLIC SCHOOL$29,000
WESTERN NORTH DAKOTA HONOR FLIGHT$25,000
INTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP$23,000
NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARY$20,000
CAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUNS INC$15,000
MOHALL PUBLIC SCHOOL$15,000
BSC FOUNDATION AND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$12,500
YOUNG LIFE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%YOUTH WORKS: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 27 repeat orgs$381k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
26

Total granted

$2.3M
$361k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+28%

Still filing today

26%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentAnimalsReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    Theodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $325k · revenue +154%
  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP
    4× · 2022–2025 · $88k · revenue +19%
  • CC
    CAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUNS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • BW
    BOTTINEAU WINTER PARK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IP
    INTERNATIONAL PEACE GARDENS
    one grant, 2020 · $42k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
2
North Dakota News Cooperative
Arts & Culture
3
Nd Natural Resources Conservation Trust

To promote the conservation of natural resources in the state of north dakota

Environment
4
Credit Union Association of the Dakotas

The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.

—
5
Community Action Partnership - Minot Region

Provide assistance to low income individuals through the community action self sufficiency programs and energy conservation assistance through the agency's weatherization program.

Human Services
6
Northern Plains Youth for Christ

YFC reaches young people everywhere, together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up followers of Jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion for sharing the love of Christ and commitment to social…

—
7
Und Center for Innovation Foundation

To maintain national leadership in entrepreneur outreach and education, and become the leader in tech entrepreneurship in rural America.

Community Improvement
8
Cankdeska Cikana Community College

To provide higher education opportunities, at the community college level, including vocational and technical training. as a tribal community college, we emphasize the teaching and learning of dakota culture and language toward the…

Education
9
North Dakota Federation of Families for Childrens Mental Health

Children's mental health

Health
10
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
11
Mitchell Area Development Corporation

Promote economic development in the mitchell, sd area

Community Improvement
12
South Dakota Youth Hunting Adventures

The purpose of south dakota youth hunting adventures is to instill in young people, a lifelong enthusiasm and respect for the outdoors, hunting and landowners, teach hunter safety, ethics, wildlife and habitat conservation by providing a…

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Dakota Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Denver Junior Golf. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTHOPE PUBLIC SCHOOL: $503,182 · OtherWESTHOPE PUBLIC SCHOOLTheodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation: $325,000 · OtherTheodore Roosevelt Medora FoundationBOTTINEAU AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $279,500 · OtherBOTTINEAU AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONWESTHOPE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP: $194,036 · OtherWESTHOPE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPNEWBURG UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $112,377 · OtherNORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $112,000 · OtherDAKOTA COLLEGE: $100,000 · Other+39 more: $740,981 · Other+39 moreINTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP: $87,823 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MINOT INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Mary: $45,000 · EducationNORTH DAKOTA ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE: $35,000 · EducationUNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $5,000 · EducationANTLER OUTLAWS: $61,000 · Community ImprovementCAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUNS: $55,000 · Recreation & SportsMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentDENVER JUNIOR GOLF: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentNORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,367,076Arts & Culture$102,823Education$85,000Community Improvement$61,000Recreation & Sports$55,000Youth Development$27,500Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTheodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation: $325,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP: $87,823 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetANTLER OUTLAWS: $61,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetCAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUNS: $55,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetBOTTINEAU WINTER PARK INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetUniversity of Mary: $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE: $35,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMINDS MATTER COLORADO INC: $25,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MINOT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTRAL DAKOTA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChild Evangelism Fellowship of North Dakota Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDENVER JUNIOR GOLF: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Theodore Roosevelt Medora Foundation ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP ↗
  • Who funds ANTLER OUTLAWS ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUNS ↗
  • Who funds BOTTINEAU WINTER PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Mary ↗
  • Who funds NORTH DAKOTA ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds MINDS MATTER COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MINOT INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL DAKOTA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring FoundationND21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Ichf Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · The Tom and Frances Leach Foundation · Inspiritus Community Health Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Northwest North Dakota Community Foundation Inc · Minot Community Foundation · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Otto Bremer Trust · Bnsf Railway Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arthur & Edith Pearson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arthur & Edith Pearson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arthur & Edith Pearson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Arthur & Edith Pearson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arthur & Edith Pearson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph