· Private foundation
Arora Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| LAZARUS HOUSE MINISTRIES | $7,500 |
| AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA | $2,750 |
| INDIANS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,100 |
| THE AD FOUNDATION | $2,100 |
| INDIA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON | $1,687 |
| INDIA NEW ENGLAND MULTIMEDIA INC | $1,500 |
| WOMEN WHO WIN INC | $1,500 |
| DESAI FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| SEWA INTERNATIONAL INC | $1,000 |
| FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VA | $1,000 |
| VISION-AID INCORPORATED | $1,000 |
| ANAYA SCHOLARS | $1,000 |
| EKAM USA INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve the human rights and self worth of south asian women and children on a global level.
To provide support for charitable and educational organizations and initiatives in the united states and abroad, including but not limited to organizations and initiatives focused on providing and facilitating access to high quality…
Our mission is to rescue, protect, and emplowe at-risk children in india and surrounding countries by providing safe, nuturing homes, holistic care, and lifelong educational support. partnering with trusted organizations and networks, we…
Public education
Intelehealth leverages open-source technology for Governments, NGOs and Hospitals to seamlessly connect 'hard to reach' populations with high quality primary healthcare. Health organizations all over the world have used our technology to…
promotes & supports causes in healthcare, education, sustainable development, womens empowerment, and social justice through grassroot organizations in India and the United States.
Provide relevant technical training skills and holistic development courses which change the trajectory of our graduates' lives, equipping them to be valuable & contributing members of their communities.
US Giving to Maher provides resources to charities in India that align with our goal of an India where all people have the opportunity for a decent life, dignity, and happiness regardless of caste, gender or religion.
Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ekam Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Indians for Collective Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
- Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds INDIANS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds AD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAHELI INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN WHO WIN INC ↗
- Who funds INDIA NEW ENGLAND MULTIMEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds Ekam USA Inc ↗
- Who funds ANAYA SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICES OF THE MERRIMACK VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗
- Who funds DESAI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VISION-AID INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arora Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Saheli Inc — 61% of income from government
- Family Services of the Merrimack Valley Inc — 11% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arora Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Arora Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.