Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aronson Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$253k
Granted FY2024still arriving
38
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$530kYouth Development$408kArts & Culture$348kEducation$61kReligion$43kHealth$34kInternational$23kSocial Science$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 38 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k32 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $52k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $146k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARMONY PROJECT HUDSON$76,200
ECOHEALTH NETWORK AT MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$70,000
USC$16,500
THE JEFFERSON INSTITUTE$15,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF ARTS$10,000
LAUMEIER SCULPTURE PARK$10,000
MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$8,000
JONAS SALK FOUNDATION$7,500
18TH STREET ARTS CENTER$7,500
LA SENORA RESEARCH INSTITUTE$5,000
WISE TROPICS INC$4,000
CWAYS HOME$1,300
UPSTATE FILMS$1,300
DAY ONE$1,000
SOCIETY FOR ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $1k → 14%COMMONWEAL: $1k → 8%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $1k → 14%COMMONWEAL: $500 → 8%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $1k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $1k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $1k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $500 → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMENS CENTER: $250 → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
OR
IA
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
AZ
NM
AR
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 66 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

66 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2024, 31 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
33

Total granted

$1.5M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+27%

Still filing today

62%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentInternationalHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HP
    HARMONY PROJECT HUDSON INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $391k · revenue +367% · 60% of their budget
  • MB
    MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +11%
  • LS
    LAUMEIER SCULPTURE PARK
    6× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • NF
    NY FRIENDS OF CHAMBER MUSIC
    one grant, 2019 · $7k
  • VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -26%
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Asia Society

The society is an international nonprofit, nonpartisan organization which connects people and institutions in asia and the world to build understanding, address challenges and maximize opportunities.

International
2
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
5
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
6
The Paley Center for Media

Description of organization mission: the paley center for media is the premier institution dedicated to advancing the understanding of media-it's artistic value, social impact and historical importance-for the public and media…

Arts & Culture
7
Berggruen Institute
Education
8
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
9
Creative Commons Corporation

Develops legal and technical infrastructure for digital creativity, sharing, and innovation.

Education
10
World Monuments Fund Inc

Wmf is the leading independent organization devoted to safeguarding the world's most treasured places to enrich people's lives and build mutual understanding across cultures and communities. the organization is headquartered in new york…

Arts & Culture
11
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Harmony Project Hudson Inc; the most unlike its peers is The National Institute for Play. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
58/63
Grantees still filing
45/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARMONY PROJECT HUDSON INC: $391,425 · Arts & CultureHARMONY PROJECT HUDSON INCLAUMEIER SCULPTURE PARK: $95,500 · Arts & CultureLAUMEIER SCULPTURE PARK18TH STREET ARTS COMPLEX: $85,500 · Arts & Culture18TH STREET ARTS COMPLEXLA SENORA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $43,500 · Arts & CultureLA SENORA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC+14 more: $28,600 · Arts & CultureECOHEALTH NETWORK AT MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN: $286,000 · OtherECOHEALTH NETWORK AT MISSOURI BOTANICAL GA…CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $72,500 · OtherCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF ARTSUSC: $38,000 · OtherUSCTHE JONAS SALK FOUNDATION: $20,500 · Other+55 more: $174,075 · Other+55 moreMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $164,751 · EnvironmentMISSOURI BOTANIC…WISE TROPICS INC: $34,000 · EnvironmentWISE TROPICS INCThe Society for Ecological Restoration Inc: $16,700 · EnvironmentThe Society for …ISLAND PRESS: $12,500 · EnvironmentISLAND PRESS+2 more: $1,750 · EnvironmentGOLDEN BRIDGE: $19,500 · EducationBARD COLLEGE: $16,250 · EducationTHE GARRISON INSTITUTE: $6,000 · EducationEAST COAST ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $4,750 · EducationKIDSPIRIT INC: $3,500 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,500 · EducationINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FORUM INC: $2,000 · Education+4 more: $3,600 · EducationCWAYS HOME: $35,600 · ReligionCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $7,250 · InternationalVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $5,000 · InternationalASHOKA: $5,000 · InternationalTHE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC: $2,400 · InternationalDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $5,750 · Human ServicesCOMMONWEAL: $1,500 · Human ServicesDay One of New York Inc: $1,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ORANGE COUNTY: $1,000 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$644,525Other$591,075Environment$229,701Education$58,100Religion$35,600International$19,650Human Services$9,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARMONY PROJECT HUDSON INC: $391,425 over 8y, 60% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES: $164,751 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAUMEIER SCULPTURE PARK: $95,500 over 6y, 2.6% of budget18TH STREET ARTS COMPLEX: $85,500 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetLA SENORA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $43,500 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetCWAYS HOME: $35,600 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetWISE TROPICS INC: $34,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetTHE JONAS SALK FOUNDATION: $20,500 over 6y, 100% of budgetGOLDEN BRIDGE: $19,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetThe Society for Ecological Restoration Inc: $16,700 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $16,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAY ONE: $13,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetISLAND PRESS: $12,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute: $8,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUPSTATE FILMS LTD: $7,450 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $7,250 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWHITE HOUSE FELLOWS FOUNDATION AND ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GARRISON INSTITUTE: $6,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $5,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHOKA: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEAST COAST ASSISTANCE DOGS INC: $4,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetKIDSPIRIT INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Onecare Education Fund: $3,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLifespan Research Institution: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget1887 FUND: $3,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $2,425 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT PLAINS CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $2,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SYNERGOS INSTITUTE INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCELEBRATE THE BEAT: $2,250 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S FORUM INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWetlands and Wildlife Care Center: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBATONGA FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAVERICK CONCERTS INC: $1,550 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMONWEAL: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAESTRO FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYALEWOMEN INC: $1,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetDay One of New York Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMONWEAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS WITHOUT A BORDER: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHudson River Music Hall Productions Inc: $1,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE SANTA FE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEAUTIFY EARTH CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARMONY PROJECT HUDSON INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds LAUMEIER SCULPTURE PARK ↗
  • Who funds 18TH STREET ARTS COMPLEX ↗
  • Who funds LA SENORA RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CWAYS HOME ↗
  • Who funds WISE TROPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JONAS SALK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN BRIDGE ↗
  • Who funds The Society for Ecological Restoration Inc ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DAY ONE ↗
  • Who funds ISLAND PRESS ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Rocky Mountain Institute ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR AMERICAN POLICE REFORM INC ↗
  • Who funds UPSTATE FILMS LTD ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds WHITE HOUSE FELLOWS FOUNDATION AND ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GARRISON INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHOKA ↗
  • Who funds EAST COAST ASSISTANCE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDSPIRIT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bessemer Giving FundNJ17× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bessemer Giving Fund · Community Foundations of the Hudson Valley Inc · David & Sylvia Teitelbaum Fund Inc · Lostand Foundation · The Thompson Family Foundation Inc · Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Annenberg Foundation · The New York Community Trust · California Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Impactassetsinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aronson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aronson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Aronson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Aronson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aronson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph