Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arnold & Reeds Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Health$15kAnimals$6kPhilanthropy$4kRecreation & Sports$4kYouth Development$4kEducation$3kReligion$3kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$360k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION$14,895
WALKER AREA FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
ST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
WHA GIRLS BASKETBALL BOOSTER$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$470
WALKER AREA FOOD SHELF$250
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 15%NEVIS TIGERS PTA: $100 → 10%CAMP CONFIDENCE: $500 → 11%TWIN CITIES WALLEYES UNLIMITED: $500 → 11%F-M WALLEYES UNLIMITED: $500 → 11%WALKER AREA FOOD SHELF: $2k → 14%ST PAUL CAPITALS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION: $500 → 14%ST PHILIPS CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $3k → 17%DALLAS SAFARI CLUB: $4k → 14%ST JUDE: $500 → 17%SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%MANDATORY FUN OUTDOORS: $500 → 10%WOMEN ANGLERS OF MINNESOTA: $500 → 11%ST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCH: $2k → 14%WALKER AREA FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WHA ACTIVITIES DEPARTMENT: $1k → 14%ST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCH: $1k → 14%WHA DRAFT TEAM: $500 → 14%THE WALKER AREA FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%WHA GIRLS BASKETBALL BOOSTER: $500 → 14%WHA WOLVES FOOTBALL: $470 → 14%NORTHSTAR SPORTSMAN CLUB: $315 → 14%WALKER AREA FOOD SHELF: $250 → 14%LEECK LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE YOUTH PROGRAMS: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Arnold & Reeds Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 45% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Arnold & Reeds Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6k · 3 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$6k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+19%

Still filing today

33%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsPhilanthropyAnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    ST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k
  • WA
    WALKER AREA FOOD SHELF INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +31%
  • WA
    WALKER AREA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $2k

Funded once

  • LL
    LEECK LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE YOUTH PROGRAMS
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • DS
    DALLAS SAFARI CLUBgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +39%
  • SP
    ST PHILIPS CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Safari Club International Minnesota

Promote wildlife and nature studies

2
Cormorant Lakes Sportsmen's Club

Dedicated to conservation preservation of wildlife and wildlife habitat

Environment
3
Minnesota Wildlife Federation

A coalition of individuals, groups, and communities dedicated to outdoor recreation and the conservation and ethical use of minnesota's natural resources by all, for all, with all.

Environment
4
South Dakota Upland Outfitters Association

To sustain and restore hunt-able pheasant populations, to encourage and educate interested youth, and to celebrate our pheasant hunting heritage in the state of south dakota.

Community Improvement
5
Safari Club International Novi Chapter

To Promote Conservation and Wilderness Training by providing Outdoors Activities

Animals
6
Minnesota Fishing Museum & Hall of Fame

The organization was created for the purpose of developing an attraction and a museum to collect, preserve, and display the artifacts of the sport of fresh water angling; and to perform a program of recognition of persons and organizations…

Arts & Culture
7
Osceola County Sportsmans Club

To provide activities which focus on hunting and fishing safety issues for all ages. preserve and protect wildlife.

8
Minnesota Deer Hunters Association

The primary purpose of the organization is to achieve the best possible deer herd, to promote high quality hunting and to protect our hunting heritage. to achieve these purposes, the following activities whall be promoted: 1. present our…

Recreation & Sports
9
Midwest Association of Fish & Wildlife Agencies

To protect right of jurisdiction of the midwestern states over their wildlife resources on public and private lands

Environment
10
Alliance for Wildlife & Conservation Inc

To enhance fish and wildlife populations, educate the public, and promote youth participation in hunting and fishing. we champion responsible science-based conservation practices and promote sustainable hunting, fishing, and land use.

Environment
11
Pa Federation of Sportsmens & Conservationists Inc

The mission of the pfsc is to protect and promote hunting, fishing, trapping and realted sportsmen's rights and privileges, to secure and defend our 2nd amendment rights as guaranteed by the constitution of the united states of america; to…

12
Trafford Sportsmens Club

Formed for the purpose of engaging in hunting, fishing, and shooting mark, as well as taking part in all other forms of outdoor sport and for the preservation of the wile life, streams and forest of pennsylvania

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safari Club International and the most unlike its peers is Walker Area Food Shelf Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEECK LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE YOUTH PROGRAMS — $3,500 · OtherLEECK LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE YOUTH PROGRAMSDALLAS SAFARI CLUB — $3,500 · OtherDALLAS SAFARI CLUBST PHILIPS CATHOLIC CHURCH — $2,500 · OtherST PHILIPS CATHOLIC CHURCHST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCH — $2,500 · OtherST AGNES CATHOLIC CHURCHWALKER AREA FOOD SHELF INC — $1,750 · OtherWALKER AREA FOOD SHELF INCWALKER AREA FOUNDATION — $1,500 · OtherWALKER AREA FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · Other+9 more — $3,885 · Other+9 moreSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION — $14,895 · PhilanthropySANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATIONSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL — $2,500 · AnimalsWOMEN ANGLERS OF MINNESOTA INC — $500 · Recreation & SportsST PAUL CAPITALS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $500 · Recreation & SportsMANDATORY FUN OUTDOORS — $500 · Health
Other$20,135Philanthropy$14,895Animals$2,500Recreation & Sports$1,000Health$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION — $14,895 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS SAFARI CLUB — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALKER AREA FOOD SHELF INC — $1,750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCONFIDENCE LEARNING CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN ANGLERS OF MINNESOTA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFM WALLEYES UNLIMITED INC — $500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetST PAUL CAPITALS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DALLAS SAFARI CLUB
  • Who funds SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds WALKER AREA FOOD SHELF INC
  • Who funds CONFIDENCE LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds WOMEN ANGLERS OF MINNESOTA INC
  • Who funds MANDATORY FUN OUTDOORS
  • Who funds FM WALLEYES UNLIMITED INC
  • Who funds ST PAUL CAPITALS HOCKEY ASSOCIATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arnold & Reeds Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph