Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arlene Topal Creative Arts Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$64kHealth$32kPhilanthropy$32kReligion$25kArts & Culture$8kEducation$7kHuman Services$3kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $21k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP RAMAH IN WISCONSIN$10,680
MJHS FOUNDATION$10,180
Individual grant recipient$7,500
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$5,000
PRAGER METIS FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
Individual grant recipient$1,800
MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN$540
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $250 → 7%HUNTER'S WORLD: $2k → 14%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $1k → 7%CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS: $500 → 7%MARLENE MEYERSON JCC MANHATTAN: $540 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$220k · 19 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +54% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
13

Total granted

$220k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+54%

Still filing today

37%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyPublic BenefitReligionArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MJ
    METROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +59%
  • HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +26%
  • TP
    THE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL
    5× · 2017–2023 · $8k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • NR
    NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +54%
  • OC
    ORANGE COUNTY JEWISH COMMUNITY SYSTEM
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • TP
    THE PRAGER METIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Zichron Chaim Meir Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
4
Jewish Life Foundation
5
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Israel Charitable Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
7
Joseph and Malka Melohn Foundation
8
American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc

Funding of organizations qualified under section 501(c) or equivalent as operating for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, or that would so qualify based on the nature of such organization's operations

International
9
American Friends of Hebron Yeshiva in Jerusalem Inc

The organization's primary purpose is to make contributions, gifts,advances or grants to or for the use of the united states, any state,territory or political subdivision thereof or the district of columbia,for exclusively public purposes…

International
10
Meor Hachaim Foundation
Philanthropy
11
The Jerusalem Connection
12
Israel Kuzminsky Memorial Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metropolitan Jewish Health System Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $47,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMP RAMAH — $29,000 · OtherCAMP RAMAHCAMP RAMAH IN WISCONSIN — $26,875 · OtherCAMP RAMAH IN WISCONSINIndividual grant recipient — $24,260 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRAGER METIS FOUNDATION — $22,875 · OtherPRAGER METIS FOUNDATIONNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC — $8,000 · Other+18 more — $38,705 · Other+18 moreMETROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $22,380 · HealthMETROPOLIT…+1 more — $500 · HealthHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $15,801 · ReligionTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL — $8,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PRAGER METIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Public BenefitAMERICA GIVES INC — $2,160 · PhilanthropyPADDY REILLY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCONTRACTORS FOR KIDS INC — $1,750 · Human ServicesHUNTERSWORLD — $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC — $540 · Human Services
Other$197,015Health$22,880Religion$15,801Arts & Culture$8,000Public Benefit$5,000Philanthropy$4,160Human Services$3,790

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $22,380 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $15,801 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL — $8,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetTHE PRAGER METIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC — $2,160 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPADDY REILLY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetCONTRACTORS FOR KIDS INC — $1,750 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE HANNA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC — $540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN JEWISH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds NATIONAL RAMAH COMMISSION INC
  • Who funds THE PIATIGORSKY FOUNDATION D/B/A PF CLASSICAL
  • Who funds THE PRAGER METIS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC
  • Who funds PADDY REILLY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CONTRACTORS FOR KIDS INC
  • Who funds HUNTERSWORLD
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEVE HANNA INC
  • Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER IN MANHATTAN INC
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY11.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arlene Topal Creative Arts Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arlene Topal Creative Arts Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Arlene Topal Creative Arts Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph