· Private foundation
Arkell Hall Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $66k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $173k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $400k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER | $200,350 |
| Individual grant recipient | $100,000 |
| CANAJOHARIE LIBRARY AND ART GALLERY | $100,000 |
| CANAJOHARIE CENTRAL SCHOOL | $40,300 |
| AYRES MEMORIAL ANIMAL SHELTER | $30,000 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,575 |
| FOUNDATION OF FMCC | $15,000 |
| FRIENDS OF BASSETT | $15,000 |
| MOUNTAIN VALLEY HOSPICE | $15,000 |
| THE VAN ALSTYNE HOMESTEAD SOCIETY | $12,500 |
| THE FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER | $10,000 |
| STONE ARABIA PRESERVATION SOCIETY | $7,500 |
| NAT'L SHRINE OF SAINT KATERI TEKAKW | $7,500 |
| FORT PLAIN REFORMED CHURCH | $7,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +0% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $242k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMAYRES MEMORIAL ANIMAL SHELTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $145k · revenue +44%
- MCMONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE FOR AGING INC3× · 2020–2022 · $31k · revenue +19%
- FPFort Plain Senior Center Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $16k · revenue +133% · 32% of their budget
Funded once
- ACARKELL CENTER INCone grant, 2021 · $700k · revenue -80% · 82% of their budget
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $20k
- FKFORT KLOCK HISTORIC RESTORATIONone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preservation & maintenance collection
The mission of The Howland Cultural Center is threefold: 1) To protect and preserve this historic building, designed by Richard Morris Hunt and commissioned by his brother-in-law, Civil War General Joseph Howland in 1872, and placed on the…
Museum provides general public with displays and information about the history of Fulton County New York.
Restoration of an historic structure known as skene manor located in whitehall ny
The primary purpose of the organization is to promote historic preservation to individual throughout the clinton, ny community and the nys area
The corporation is organized to promote the best interests for the senior citizens of the city of saratoga springs, new york and the county of saratoga in the state of new york; to maintain and operate a building as a meeting place for…
The Saratoga County History Center collects and preserves artifacts and materials relating to the hisory of Saratoga county. The Center makes these material available for research and also for educational programs.
To promote and produce Public Art for the enjoyment of the community and for the economic benefit of the community.
To preserve all documents to educate, engage and inform the residents and visitors concerning Wilmington, the Whiteface Mountain Region and the Adirondack community.
The organization was formed to safeguard and share existing and future collections related to the social, cultural, and economic history of the high peaks adirondack region in and around the township of newcomb in essex county, new york.
The mission of the Sharon Historical Society is to make all people aware of our history by linking the past with the present in order to inform them of our future. The Sharon Historical Society exists to inspire people's understanding that…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canajoharie Library & Art Gallery and the most unlike its peers is Fort Plain Senior Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARKELL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds AYRES MEMORIAL ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds CANAJOHARIE LIBRARY & ART GALLERY ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY OFFICE FOR AGING INC ↗
- Who funds Fort Plain Senior Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Friends of Bassett Inc ↗
- Who funds FORT KLOCK HISTORIC RESTORATION ↗
- Who funds CAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Mohawk Valley Collective Inc ↗
- Who funds HELPING HANDS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds WAMC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sterling Insurance Company Foundation 008132 · William&Vina Baker Yerdon Fndtion · William Gundry Broughton Charitable Private Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arkell Hall Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arkell Hall Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Arkell Hall Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.