Skip to content
Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association at a glance

· Public charity

Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association

Promote breeding and training of greyhounds in arkansas

$223k
Granted FY2022
6
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0176% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Animals$382kCrime & Legal$128kEducation$78kHuman Services$73kRecreation & Sports$68kPhilanthropy$17kHealth$16kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2022 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $88k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$222k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWS FOR THE CAUSE$134,999
MEDING HEARTS CHILD SAFETY CENTER$30,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CONTRIBUTIONS 5000 OR LESS$17,500
BIKES FOR TYKES$10,850
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GPA MASS: $3k → 8%GPA GREATER NORTWEST WASHINGTON: $3k → 10%NITTANY GREYHOUNDS PA: $3k → 16%DELAWARE NORTH: $10k → 13%HALF-WAY HOME ADOPTION OKLAHOMA: $3k → 15%GREHOUND CROSS ROADS: $3k → 18%FL GREYHOUND ASSN: $100k → 13%ARKANSAS HUNGER RELIEF: $10k → 17%GREYHOUND SUPPORT TRANSPORT: $3k → 11%BOX TO WIRE GREYHOUNDS DAYTONA: $3k → 12%GREYHOUND PETS OF JACKSONVILLE: $3k → 14%ALABAMA GREYHOUND ADOPTION: $3k → 16%GREYHOUND AS PET OF AMERICA: $3k → 8%MUSIC CITY GREYHOUND ADOPTION: $3k → 9%WINGS CANCER FOUNDATION: $4k → 17%PROJECT RACING NORTH CAROLINA: $3k → 14%GREYHOUND ADOPTIONS OF OHIO: $3k → 6%WEST VIRGINIA KENNEL OWNERS ASSO: $10k → 15%FLORIDA GREYHOUND ASSOCIATION: $18k → 13%ARKANSAS SPORTS HALL OF FAME: $10k → 17%PAWS FOR THE CAUSE: $135k → 22%AR SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $5k → 17%PAWS FOR THE CAUSE: $125k → 22%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $7k → 17%WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $50k → 17%P A W S: $100k → 22%CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $24k → 17%MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $51k → 22%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $15k → 17%PAWS FOR THE CAUSE: $48k → 22%LEBONHEUR CHILDRENS HOSP: $10k → 17%CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER: $15k → 17%A BIT OF HOPE: $14k → 22%DOWNS SYNDROME MEMPHIS: $5k → 17%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $14k → 17%P A W S: $8k → 22%CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $10k → 17%MARION ANIMAL SHELTER: $6k → 22%MARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5k → 22%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $6k → 17%14 ST GREYHOUND ADOPTION ASSO: $14k → 22%TOMMY GOLDSBY FOUNDATION: $10k → 22%10 LOCAL CHARITIES: $8k → 22%ASU MID-SOUTH FOUNDATION: $8k → 22%ASU MID-SOUTH FOUNDATION: $6k → 22%WEST MEMPHIS ANIMAL SHELTER: $5k → 22%ST MICHAELS SCHOOL: $4k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
ID
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
MO
WV
VA
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$822k · 9 repeat orgs$444k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +107% since the first grant, against -48% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
54

Total granted

$822k
$394k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
-48%

Still filing today

33%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
AnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PAWS FOR THE CAUSE
    3× · 2019–2022 · $307k
  • C5
    CONTRIBUTIONS 5000 OR LESS
    4× · 2019–2022 · $208k
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PINE BLUFF
    6× · 2017–2022 · $128k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • MS
    MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $51k
  • FG
    FLORIDA GREYHOUND ASSOCIATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grayhound Angels Rescue & Adoption Inc

We find quality homes for retired racing greyhounds and support all greyhounds and their owners

Animals
2
Greyhound Companions of Missouri

Rescue retired greyhounds and place in homes

—
3
Greyhound Rescue of New York Inc

To rescue greyhounds

Animals
4
Fast Friends Greyhound Adoption in
—
5
American Greyhound Council

Provide educational material for the care and training of racing greyhound dogs.

—
6
Greyhound Pet Adoption Fl Se Inc

Place retired racing greyhounds in homes

—
7
Maine Greyhound Placement Service

To find loving, responsible homes for retired greyhounds that can no longer compete on the racetrack.

Animals
8
Carolina Greys Greyhound Adoption Inc

Dog adoption

Animals
9
Greyhound Pets of America

Finding adoptive homes for retired racing greyhound adoptions

Animals
10
National Greyhound Adoption Program Dba Dutton Road Veterinary Clinic

Rescuing greyhound dogs from demise by providing veterinary care, boarding and adoptive services.

Animals
11
Golden State Greyhound Adoption

Greyhound adoption

Animals
12
Ajc Rescue & Transport

Dog Rescue & Transport

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-South Greyhound Adoption Option Inc; the most unlike its peers is Families in Transition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
6/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PAWS FOR THE CAUSE: $307,499 · OtherPAWS FOR THE CAUSECONTRIBUTIONS 5000 OR LESS: $208,329 · OtherCONTRIBUTIONS 5000 OR LESSTHE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PINE BLUFF: $127,500 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PINE BLUFFP A W S: $108,416 · OtherP A W SIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARION SCHOOL DISTRICT: $51,243 · OtherBIKES FOR TYKES: $41,930 · Other+50 more: $286,651 · Other+50 moreARKANSAS SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILIES IN TRANSITION: $6,500 · Human ServicesGOOD NEIGHBOR CENTER INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesGREYHOUND CROSSROADS: $2,500 · Animals4 GREYHOUND RACERS: $2,500 · AnimalsGREYHOUND SUPPORT TRANSPORT INC: $2,500 · AnimalsGREYHOUND ADOPTION OF OHIO INC: $2,500 · AnimalsFRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER: $3,750 · Education
Other$1,231,568Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$10,000Animals$10,000Education$3,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PINE BLUFF: $127,500 over 6y, 13% of budgetFLORIDA GREYHOUND ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetARKANSAS SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC: $6,600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILIES IN TRANSITION: $6,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetMARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $5,750 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetDELTAARTS INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER: $3,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBOR CENTER INC: $3,500 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetGREYHOUND CROSSROADS: $2,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budget4 GREYHOUND RACERS: $2,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetGREYHOUND SUPPORT TRANSPORT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHEAST ARKANSAS INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL GREYHOUND ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID-SOUTH GREYHOUND ADOPTION OPTION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF PINE BLUFF ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA GREYHOUND ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS SPORTS HALL OF FAME INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES IN TRANSITION ↗
  • Who funds MARION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds DELTAARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANK C STEUDLEIN LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBOR CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREYHOUND CROSSROADS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southland Park Commun…Amazonsmile Foundation
Southland Park Community Foundation IncAR17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southland Park Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association?

    Find your warmest path to Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arkansas Greyhound Owners and Breeders Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home