Skip to content

· Public charity

Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual Assault

To serve as a collective voice to eliminate all forms of sexual violence and advocate for the rights and needs of individuals affected by sexual assault through program support, education, and social change.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$309k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$4.1MCrime & Legal$2.7MPublic Safety & Disaster$236kHousing & Shelter$85k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $81k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+2 grants · $582k
$145,454
Median grant
1
States reached
$790k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OZARK RAPE CRISIS CENTER$309,103
CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC$272,402
NWA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER$200,931
FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION$195,844
LONOKE CO SAFE HAVEN$187,405
WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER OF S AR$158,966
FAMILIES IN TRANSITION$145,454
FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC$124,770
SALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN$106,514
WHITE CO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENT$80,979
OPTIONS INC$74,019
WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST$51,918
SW ARKANSAS CRISIS & RESOURCE CENTE$41,062
RISE HOUSE CONWAY$39,541
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PRENTION: $36k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 16 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
3

Total granted

$7.1M
$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+46%

Still filing today

69%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OR
    OZARK RAPE CRISIS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +165% · 41% of their budget
  • CI
    CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $983k · revenue +45%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $552k · revenue +83% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • WC
    WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER OF SOUTH AR
    one grant, 2018 · $43k
  • CA
    COMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $37k · revenue -19%
  • DV
    Domestic Violence Prevention Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +46%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

Rape crisis and abuse shelter

—
2
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
3
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
4
Crisis Intervention Shelter Service

Assistance to victims of violence.provide women & children salfe shelter, support groups, advocacy, referrals, financial assistance, hotline.

Human Services
5
Woman Survival Inc

Help abused & battered woman

Housing & Shelter
6
Crisis Control Center

Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.

Human Services
7
Northstar Advocacy Center

This center brings victims of domestic violence and sexual assault together to provide a safe and nurturing place to learn and grow through crisis and case management, court advocacy, support groups and 24 hour crisis hotline.

Human Services
8
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
9
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
10
Three Rivers Crisis Center

Eliminating domestic violence and sexual abuse in our society.

Human Services
11
Response Inc

Prevention of domestic violence

Crime & Legal
12
Abuse Resource Network

Support services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault & other crimes. we serve city and rural populations - men - women & children.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Intervention Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Families in Transition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OZARK RAPE CRISIS INC: $1,441,950 · OtherOZARK RAPE CRISIS INCCRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $983,187 · OtherCRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INCNWA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER: $731,100 · OtherNWA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTERWOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $552,082 · OtherWOMEN'S CRISIS CENTERLONOKE CO SAFE HAVEN: $373,827 · OtherLONOKE CO SAFE HAVENSW ARKANSAS CRISIS & RESOURCE CENTE: $235,886 · OtherNORTHWEST TECHNICAL INSTITUTE: $226,575 · Other+3 more: $274,866 · Other+3 moreFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $495,426 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION INCWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $431,330 · Human ServicesWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER …FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $386,920 · Human ServicesFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INCFAMILIES IN TRANSITION: $339,790 · Human ServicesFAMILIES IN TRANSITIONWHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $263,990 · Human ServicesWHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PRE…OPTIONS INC: $199,927 · Human ServicesOPTIONS INC+2 more: $73,119 · Human ServicesSALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC: $156,107 · Crime & Legal
Other$4,819,473Human Services$2,190,502Crime & Legal$156,107

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOZARK RAPE CRISIS INC: $1,441,950 over 9y, 41% of budgetCRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC: $983,187 over 9y, 24% of budgetWOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER: $552,082 over 7y, 33% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $495,426 over 3y, 18% of budgetWOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $431,330 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $386,920 over 4y, 14% of budgetFAMILIES IN TRANSITION: $339,790 over 3y, 15% of budgetWHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC: $263,990 over 3y, 16% of budgetOPTIONS INC: $199,927 over 3y, 10% of budgetSALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC: $156,107 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetNORTHWEST ARKANSAS RAPE CRISIS INC: $147,101 over 2y, 16% of budgetCOMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INC: $37,363 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetDomestic Violence Prevention Inc: $35,756 over 1y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OZARK RAPE CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN & CHILDREN FIRST THE CENTER AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES IN TRANSITION ↗
  • Who funds WHITE COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds SALINE COUNTY SAFE HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS RAPE CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE AGAINST SPOUSE ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Domestic Violence Prevention Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceAR28.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arvest Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual Assault funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual Assault. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arkansas Coalition Against Sexual Assault’s filings →

    More from the funding graph