Skip to content

· Public charity

Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc

To assist Mentally Handicapped, Youth Activies, Religious Vocations, Retired Religious Ministers, and other Catholic Charities.

$403k
Granted FY2026still arriving
14
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$62k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$375kHuman Services$170kRecreation & Sports$143kHealth$83kYouth Development$42kCivil Rights$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHousing & Shelter$8kOther$0
02FY2026 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $195,753, the rows itemized in this filing. The $402,799 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $207,046 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k6 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $62k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$526k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center$62,150
Diocese of Phoenix$20,725
Diocese of Tucson$15,500
St Josephs Youth Camp$15,160
St Vincent de Paul Council 1$12,213
AZ Life Coalition$10,000
Diocese of Gallup$10,000
Aid to Women Center$10,000
Council 7243 St George$8,420
St Mary Catholic Parish$7,332
St Marys Catholic High School$6,750
Individual grant recipient$6,000
St Elizabeth Ann Seton Churc$6,000
Cncl 8305 St John Neuman Yuma$5,503
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Maggies Place: $8k → 11%New Day to Train to Sustain: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$802k · 12 repeat orgs$247k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$802k
$158k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-4%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $143k · revenue +26%
  • AT
    AID TO WOMEN CENTER
    3× · 2023–2026 · $92k · revenue +61%
  • DC
    DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX
    4× · 2021–2026 · $58k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CP
    Choices Pregnancy Centers
    one grant, 2023 · $38k
  • AA
    Advice and Aid Pregnancy Cent
    one grant, 2023 · $29k
  • MF
    March for Life Ed and Defense
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pregnancy Help Center of San Gabriel Valley Inc

The pregnancy help center of san gabriel provides a safe caring environment where women who may be pregnant or who are pregnant can be supported with dignity during and after pregnancy.

Health
2
Crisis Pregnancy Center of the Treasure Coast

To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…

Health
3
Hannahs Home

Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.

Human Services
4
Pregnancy Life Center

Protect life of the unborn and provide housing and life skills for homeless pregnant women and mothers with new babies that are accepted into our maternaty home program

Human Services
5
Aid for Women Inc

Aid for Women operates pregnancy help centers, pregnancy medical clinics and residential programs to assist women in difficult and unexpected pregnancy situations so that they might choose life.

—
6
Life Choice Care Center Inc

To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.

Human Services
7
Catholic Pregnancy Help Center Inc Dba Loving Choice

Our mission is to provide spiritual, emotional, educational and material support to expectant mothers and fathers who are faced with an un-planned pregnancy so they may successfully carry their babies to term, based on catholic social and…

Human Services
8
Life Choices Care Center

To provide support for pregnant women

Health
9
Davie Pregnancy Care Center Inc

Life-affirming ministry for persons facing crisis pregnancies: preg tests, ultrasounds, material resources; education about pregnancy, stds, parenting.

Human Services
10
Hope Pregnancy Support Center

Support Women in Crisis Pregnancy

Health
11
Abel Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc

Crisis pregnancy services - pregnancy counseling

Health
12
Pregnancy Crisis Center Inc

To share the gospel of jesus christ by offering practical, emotional, and spiritual support to those facing pregnancy & abortion related concerns

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diocesan Council for the Society of St Vincent De Paul Diocese Phoenix; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Men's Fellowship of Phoenix Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCE: $205,154 · OtherUNITED STATES CATHOLIC CONFERENCETHE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TUCSON OUR FAITH OUR HOPE OUR FUTU: $145,500 · OtherTHE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF TUCSON OUR FAITH OUR HOPE OUR FUTUAID TO WOMEN CENTER: $92,368 · OtherAID TO WOMEN CENTERHope Crisis Pregnancy Center dba Hope Pregnancy Resource Center: $62,150 · OtherHope Crisis Pregnancy Center dba Hope Pregnancy Resource CenterSt Josephs Youth Camp: $49,116 · OtherSt Josephs Youth CampChoices Pregnancy Centers: $37,750 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $30,000 · OtherAdvice and Aid Pregnancy Cent: $29,018 · Other+17 more: $166,273 · Other+17 moreSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC: $143,473 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPIC…DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $58,439 · ReligionSHARING DOWN SYNDROME ARIZONA INC: $5,738 · HealthCUPERTINO ACADEMY INC: $5,457 · HealthHacienda Inc: $5,400 · HealthMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesA NEW DAY VOCATIONAL PROGRAM: $5,796 · Human Services
Other$817,329Recreation & Sports$143,473Religion$58,439Health$16,595Human Services$13,296

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC: $143,473 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetAID TO WOMEN CENTER: $92,368 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX: $58,439 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSt Josephs Youth Camp: $49,116 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetMAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCUPERTINO ACADEMY INC: $5,457 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHacienda Inc: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $5,018 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds AID TO WOMEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center dba Hope Pregnancy Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds St Josephs Youth Camp ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEN'S FELLOWSHIP OF PHOENIX INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds A NEW DAY VOCATIONAL PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds SHARING DOWN SYNDROME ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds CUPERTINO ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Hacienda Inc ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph