· Public charity
Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc
To assist Mentally Handicapped, Youth Activies, Religious Vocations, Retired Religious Ministers, and other Catholic Charities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 14 grants below total $195,753 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $402,799 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $207,046 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2026
- Under $10k6 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $94k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $62k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center | $62,150 |
| Diocese of Phoenix | $20,725 |
| Diocese of Tucson | $15,500 |
| St Josephs Youth Camp | $15,160 |
| St Vincent de Paul Council 1 | $12,213 |
| Aid to Women Center | $10,000 |
| Diocese of Gallup | $10,000 |
| AZ Life Coalition | $10,000 |
| Council 7243 St George | $8,420 |
| St Mary Catholic Parish | $7,332 |
| St Marys Catholic High School | $6,750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $6,000 |
| St Elizabeth Ann Seton Churc | $6,000 |
| Cncl 8305 St John Neuman Yuma | $5,503 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SOSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC8× · 2017–2024 · $143k · revenue +26%
- ATAID TO WOMEN CENTER3× · 2023–2026 · $92k · revenue +61%
- DCDIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX4× · 2021–2026 · $58k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- CPChoices Pregnancy Centersone grant, 2023 · $38k
- AAAdvice and Aid Pregnancy Centone grant, 2023 · $29k
- KCKOC Charity Hurricane Reliefone grant, 2025 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The pregnancy help center of san gabriel provides a safe caring environment where women who may be pregnant or who are pregnant can be supported with dignity during and after pregnancy.
To defend life, to meet physical, social and spiritual needs of those who may be experiencing a crisis pregnancy, to bring healing and wholeness to lives traumatized by abortion, to present the gospel of jesus christ, and to challenge the…
Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.
Protect life of the unborn and provide housing and life skills for homeless pregnant women and mothers with new babies that are accepted into our maternaty home program
Aid for Women operates pregnancy help centers, pregnancy medical clinics and residential programs to assist women in difficult and unexpected pregnancy situations so that they might choose life.
To provide physical and emotional support to women and their families facing unplanned pregnancies through a christ centered and biblically based approach.
Our mission is to provide spiritual, emotional, educational and material support to expectant mothers and fathers who are faced with an un-planned pregnancy so they may successfully carry their babies to term, based on catholic social and…
To provide support for pregnant women
Life-affirming ministry for persons facing crisis pregnancies: preg tests, ultrasounds, material resources; education about pregnancy, stds, parenting.
Support Women in Crisis Pregnancy
Crisis pregnancy services - pregnancy counseling
To share the gospel of jesus christ by offering practical, emotional, and spiritual support to those facing pregnancy & abortion related concerns
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diocesan Council for the Society of St Vincent De Paul Diocese Phoenix and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Men's Fellowship of Phoenix Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds AID TO WOMEN CENTER ↗
- Who funds Hope Crisis Pregnancy Center dba Hope Pregnancy Resource Center ↗
- Who funds DIOCESAN COUNCIL FOR THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds St Josephs Youth Camp ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC MEN'S FELLOWSHIP OF PHOENIX INC ↗
- Who funds MAGGIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds A NEW DAY VOCATIONAL PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SHARING DOWN SYNDROME ARIZONA INC ↗
- Who funds CUPERTINO ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Hacienda Inc ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc?
Find your warmest path to Arizona Knights of Columbus Charity Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.