Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arirang Community Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Civil Rights$481kReligion$194kHuman Services$149kPublic Benefit$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kEducation$22kEmployment$21kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOREAN AMERICAN SERNIOR ASSOCIATION$3,000
SO CAL WOORI PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
CHUNG ANG UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOC$3,000
KOREAN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF OC$2,000
GRACE KOREAN CHURCH AT NORWALK$2,000
GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
ARIRANG WOMEN'S CHOIR$1,000
KOREAN AMERICAN VETERANS LEGION$1,000
KOREAN GOSPEL BROADCASTING COMPANY$1,000
THE HAN-IN CHRISTIAN ELDERS IN CA$1,000
HANSARANG CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNITED ACROSS BORDERS FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $15k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $10k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $5k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $5k → 10%HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER: $5k → 10%HAPPY VILLAGE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$826k · 18 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
27

Total granted

$826k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+53%

Still filing today

39%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +66%
  • GG
    GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $18k · revenue +66%
  • CP
    Corona Police Officers Association
    3× · 2018–2021 · $16k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • KW
    KOREAN WAR MEMORIAL COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • WP
    WOORI PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SC
    SISTER CITY ASSOCIATION OF GG
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Korean Senior Citizens Association of San Fernando Valley
Recreation & Sports
2
Korean American Network International

To spread the gospel to the underserved countries

International
3
Seoul Presbyterian Church

Church

—
4
Korean World Mission Council
Religion
5
Korean Central Presbyterian Church of Houston

The church was established to have christian worship, fellowship, bible education, missionary and services.

—
6
Korea Campus Crusade for Christinc

To evangelize and to do related activities for jesus.

—
7
The Korean Church of Ann Arbor

To fullfil our mission we embrace the following purpose to bring believers to spritual maturity through Fellowship with other Christian, Learing and living Christs teachings, Outreach to all people, Worshipping Him alone and doing and…

Religion
8
Korean Christian Broadcasting System

None

Arts & Culture
9
Korean Missionary Society Usa Inc

To support catholic fathers and missionaries all over the world

Religion
10
Joyful Korean Community Church

The mission of the church is to go into the world and make disciples by declaring the gospel of Jesus Christ in the power of the Spirit and gathering these disciples into churches, that they might worship the Lord and obey his commands now…

Religion
11
Korean American Association and Community Center of Houston

Teaching and introducing Korean language, history, and culture to Houston community.

Arts & Culture
12
Korean American Federation of La

To support and serve better for the furtherance of the rights and interests of the korean community at los angeles

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Korean American Seniors Association of Oc; the most unlike its peers is Corona Police Officers Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KOREAN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF OC: $480,648 · OtherKOREAN AMERICAN FEDERATION OF OCKorean American Seniors Association of OC: $90,000 · OtherKorean American Seniors Association of OCGRACE KOREAN CHURCH AT NORWALK: $51,000 · OtherGRACE KOREAN CHURCH AT NORWALKKOREAN WAR MEMORIAL COMMITTEE: $30,000 · OtherSA-RANG COMMUNITY CHURCH: $30,000 · Other+34 more: $200,800 · Other+34 moreHANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY VILLAGE: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesGARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 · EmploymentACCOMPANY WORLDWIDE INC: $3,000 · EmploymentGARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropySRC INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · ReligionKOREAN GOSPEL BROADCASTING CO INC: $4,000 · ReligionKorean American Dementia Center: $3,000 · ReligionMIJU GMP: $2,000 · ReligionCHUNG-ANG UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $8,000 · Education
Other$882,448Human Services$44,000Employment$20,500Philanthropy$20,000Religion$19,000Education$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKorean American Seniors Association of OC: $90,000 over 6y, 31% of budgetHANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $40,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetGARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOCIATION INC: $17,500 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCorona Police Officers Association: $16,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetSRC INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetCHUNG-ANG UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetKOREAN GOSPEL BROADCASTING CO INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKorean American Dementia Center: $3,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetACCOMPANY WORLDWIDE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetHAPPY VILLAGE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIJU GMP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Korean American Seniors Association of OC ↗
  • Who funds HANMI FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN GROVE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN GROVE POLICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Corona Police Officers Association ↗
  • Who funds SRC INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CHUNG-ANG UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN GOSPEL BROADCASTING CO INC ↗
  • Who funds Korean American Dementia Center ↗
  • Who funds ACCOMPANY WORLDWIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds MIJU GMP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Open Stewardship FoundationCA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Open Stewardship Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arirang Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arirang Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arirang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph