Skip to content
Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders

To serve the community by providing education to increase awareness and transform perspectives around substance use and co-occuring mental health disorders.

$117k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$146kHousing & Shelter$27kHuman Services$21k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $30,970, the rows itemized in this filing. The $117,383 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $86,413 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$674k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE (CBHC)$14,820
CATHY'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC$11,000
VALERIE'S HOUSE INC$5,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%REGENERATE YOUR AUTHENTIC NATURE (RYAN HEALING CENTER): $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$167k · 5 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
5

Total granted

$167k
$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+32%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $98k · revenue +53%
  • VH
    VALERIE'S HOUSE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $26k · revenue -3%
  • G
    GLENBEIGH
    3× · 2017–2022 · $21k

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDENCE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -2%
  • RY
    REGENERATE YOUR AUTHENTIC NATURE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +32%
  • HH
    HILLJACK HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Renovatus

Addiction recovery program & residency

Housing & Shelter
2
Crossroads Recovery House
—
3
Alco Halfway House

Provide housing and residential care for recovering alcoholic

—
4
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

—
5
The Mend House Sober Living Community

The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…

Health
6
Serenity House Inc

Alcoholic rehabilitation program 100-200 residents.

Health
7
Harbor House Inc

Alcohol drug rehab and halfway house.

Health
8
Alano House

To provide a safe and healthy environment for the alcoholic/addict and their families to find recovery and outpatient addiction treatment services

—
9
Bell Tower Recovery Mission Inc

To provide housing for individuals recovering from addiction

Human Services
10
The Olive Tree Sober Living
—
11
Arise Recovery Residences Inc

Our mission is to provide a safe and structured environment where alcoholics and addicts can develop the skills and tools necessary to achieve long term recovery. We believe that anyone can live their life without the use of alcohol and…

Health
12
First Step Recovery House Inc

To provide shelter for persons recovering from drug or alcohol additions

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healing Transitions Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Alliance of Recovery Residence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC: $98,456 · HealthCHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INCHILLJACK HOUSE INC: $7,380 · HealthHILLJACK HOUSE INCHEALING TRANSITIONS INC: $6,000 · HealthHANANI HOUSE: $5,500 · HealthGLENBEIGH: $21,015 · OtherGLENBEIGHNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDENCE: $20,000 · OtherNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDEN…TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $11,711 · OtherTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBS…CATHY'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INC: $11,000 · OtherCATHY'S PLACE OF CHARLOTTE COUNTY INCNIKKI PERLOW FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherNIKKI PERLOW FOUNDATIONVALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $26,050 · Human ServicesVALERIE'S HOUSE I…REGENERATE YOUR AUTHENTIC NATURE INC: $7,800 · Human ServicesREGENERATE YOUR A…
Health$117,336Other$73,726Human Services$33,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC: $98,456 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetVALERIE'S HOUSE INC: $26,050 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDENCE: $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $11,711 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREGENERATE YOUR AUTHENTIC NATURE INC: $7,800 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHILLJACK HOUSE INC: $7,380 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHEALING TRANSITIONS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANANI HOUSE: $5,500 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Valerie's House Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home