· Public charity
Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders
To serve the community by providing education to increase awareness and transform perspectives around substance use and co-occuring mental health disorders.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $41,380 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $99,023 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $57,643 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $26k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE (CBHC) | $15,300 |
| VALERIE'S HOUSE INC | $10,900 |
| REGENERATE YOUR AUTHENTIC NATURE (RYAN HEALING CENTER) | $7,800 |
| HILLJACK HOUSE INC | $7,380 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CBCHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $84k · revenue +53%
- GGLENBEIGH3× · 2017–2022 · $21k
- VHVALERIE'S HOUSE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $21k · revenue -3%
Funded once
- NANATIONAL ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDENCEone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -2%
HEALING TRANSITIONS INCone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -32%- HHHANANI HOUSEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Addiction recovery program & residency
Assisting and housing females in recovery
The Mend House is a sober living community for men, in Knoxville, Tn. which empowers them to gain control over their actions, decisions and choices. The Mend House allows men to enjoy clean, sober and stable housing for up to 2 years while…
Alcoholic rehabilitation program 100-200 residents.
Alcohol drug rehab and halfway house.
To provide a safe and healthy environment for the alcoholic/addict and their families to find recovery and outpatient addiction treatment services
To provide housing for individuals recovering from addiction
Our mission is to provide a safe and structured environment where alcoholics and addicts can develop the skills and tools necessary to achieve long term recovery. We believe that anyone can live their life without the use of alcohol and…
To provide shelter for persons recovering from drug or alcohol additions
Provider of sober living for recovering addicts and alcoholics
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healing Transitions Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Alliance of Recovery Residence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARLOTTE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE INC ↗
- Who funds VALERIE'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE OF RECOVERY RESIDENCE ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC ↗
- Who funds REGENERATE YOUR AUTHENTIC NATURE INC ↗
- Who funds HILLJACK HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HEALING TRANSITIONS INC ↗
- Who funds HANANI HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Archway Institute for Mental Health and Addictive Disorders funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Valerie's House Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.