Skip to content

· Public charity

Arc Thrift Stores Inc

As one of the nations largest employers of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, we believe in the power of employment to foster independence and fulfillment.

$17M
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$115M
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $64k
  • $250k+16 grants · $17M
$988,371
Median grant
2
States reached
$174M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION$2,049,468
ADVOCACY DENVER$1,897,110
ARC OF ARAPAHOE AND DOUGLAS INC$1,746,344
THE ARC IN JEFFERSON COUNTY$1,578,407
THE ARC OF ADAMS COUNTY INC$1,337,504
THE ARC OF AURORA INC$1,159,750
ACL IN BOULDER COUNTY$1,159,479
THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC$1,059,526
THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY$988,371
THE ARC OF COLORADO$791,416
THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC$745,826
THE ARC MESA COUNTY$608,495
CEREBRAL PALSY OF COLORADO INC$411,716
ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO$355,323
ARC OF SOUTHWEST COLORADO INC$334,210
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $27.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $988k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $1.1M → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $446k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $746k → 15%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $950k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $1.0M → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $355k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $717k → 15%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $876k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $946k → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $333k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $670k → 15%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $780k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $858k → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $316k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $613k → 15%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $670k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $747k → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $295k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $534k → 15%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $640k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $717k → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $255k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $512k → 15%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $588k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $667k → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $234k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $469k → 15%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $566k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $633k → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $160k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $453k → 15%THE ARC OF WELD COUNTY: $546k → 9%THE ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY INC: $623k → 11%ARC OF WEST CENTRAL COLORADO: $81k → 15%THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $433k → 15%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $791k → 12%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $760k → 12%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $720k → 12%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $665k → 12%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $582k → 12%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $567k → 12%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $528k → 12%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $499k → 12%THE ARC OF COLORADO: $498k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$115M · 16 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
1

Total granted

$115M
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14M · revenue +47% · 83% of their budget
  • AO
    ARC OF DENVER INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +81% · 96% of their budget
  • TA
    THE ARC ARAPAHOE DOUGLAS & ELBERT COUNTIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $12M · revenue +69% · 98% of their budget

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ARC OF NEW MEXICO
    one grant, 2025 · $64k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arc Community Advocates

We exist as an advocacy organization to make it possible for each person with a developmental disability to participate fully in all aspects of community and to support the effort of each individual to determine their own future.

Human Services
2
The Arc Alliance Advocacy Services

To assist people of all ages with intellecutal and developmental disabilities to obtain the rights and resources they require to become, to the fullest-extent possible, independent, self-sufficient, participating and contributing members…

Civil Rights
3
The Arc of Crawford County Inc

The ARC of Crawford County, Inc. advocates for the rights of citizens with intellectual and developmental disabilities and enhances their lives by promoting maximum independence and affording them opportunities for enrichment.

—
4
The Arc of Lancaster County

Empowering people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) and their families to lead full, satisfying, independent lives of their choice.

Health
5
The Arc of Louisiana

The arc of louisiana advocates for and with individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families.

—
6
Arc of Arizona Inc

Advocates for the rights and participation of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. together with our network of members and affiliated chapters, we improve systems of support, connect families, inspire communication,…

—
7
The Arc of the Capital Area

We empower central texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families through compassionate case management and innovative programs.

—
8
The Arc of Walker County

To advocate and provide services for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities and to provide support to family and friends of those individuals.

Human Services
9
Arc Rutland Area Inc

To advocate for the right of individuals with developmental disabilities and their families to be regarded as valued citizens with the same entitlements as non-disabled individuals, including the right to lifelong opportunities for…

—
10
The Arc of Illinois

The Arc of Illinois is committed to empowering persons with disabilities to achieve full participation in community life through informed choices.

—
11
The Arc of Bartholomew County

Promote and protect the human rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and actively support their full inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetimes.

Human Services
12
The Arc of Union Cabarrus Inc

To enhance the lives of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Colorado; the most unlike its peers is Ability Connection Colorado Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
16/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION: $14,131,994 · OtherTHE ARC PIKES PEAK REGIONARC OF DENVER INC: $13,452,646 · OtherARC OF DENVER INCTHE ARC ARAPAHOE DOUGLAS & ELBERT COUNTIES INC: $12,157,253 · OtherTHE ARC ARAPAHOE DOUGLAS & ELBERT COUNTIES INCTHE ARC OF ADAMS COUNTY INC: $9,353,666 · OtherTHE ARC OF ADAMS COUNTY INCASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING: $8,097,248 · OtherASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVINGTHE ARC OF AURORA: $8,073,332 · OtherTHE ARC OF AURORAADVOCACY RESOURCE COALITION PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $4,317,212 · OtherADVOCACY RESOURCE COALITION PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES+1 more: $63,575 · OtherARC OF LARIMER COUNTY: $7,267,835 · Human ServicesARC OF LARIMER COUNTYTHE ARC OF NORTHEAST COLORADO: $6,603,628 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF NORTHEAST COLOR…THE ARC OF COLORADO: $5,609,734 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF COLORADOTHE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $5,146,155 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF PUEBLO INCARC of West Central Colorado: $2,475,919 · Human ServicesARC of West Central Colora…THE ARC - JEFFERSON CLEAR CREEK & GILPIN COUNTIES: $11,222,852 · Civil RightsTHE ARC - J…ABILITY CONNECTION COLORADO INC: $4,038,598 · HealthTHE ARC OF SOUTHWEST COLORADO INC: $1,818,383 · HealthARC OF THE CENTRAL MOUNTAINS: $892,140 · Arts & Culture
Other$69,646,926Human Services$27,103,271Civil Rights$11,222,852Health$5,856,981Arts & Culture$892,140

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION: $14,131,994 over 9y, 83% of budgetARC OF DENVER INC: $13,452,646 over 9y, 96% of budgetTHE ARC ARAPAHOE DOUGLAS & ELBERT COUNTIES INC: $12,157,253 over 9y, 98% of budgetTHE ARC - JEFFERSON CLEAR CREEK & GILPIN COUNTIES: $11,222,852 over 9y, 92% of budgetTHE ARC OF ADAMS COUNTY INC: $9,353,666 over 9y, 98% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING: $8,097,248 over 9y, 69% of budgetTHE ARC OF AURORA: $8,073,332 over 9y, 91% of budgetARC OF LARIMER COUNTY: $7,267,835 over 9y, 94% of budgetTHE ARC OF NORTHEAST COLORADO: $6,603,628 over 9y, 93% of budgetTHE ARC OF COLORADO: $5,609,734 over 9y, 86% of budgetTHE ARC OF PUEBLO INC: $5,146,155 over 9y, 98% of budgetADVOCACY RESOURCE COALITION PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $4,317,212 over 9y, 99% of budgetABILITY CONNECTION COLORADO INC: $4,038,598 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetARC of West Central Colorado: $2,475,919 over 9y, 96% of budgetTHE ARC OF SOUTHWEST COLORADO INC: $1,818,383 over 9y, 80% of budgetARC OF THE CENTRAL MOUNTAINS: $892,140 over 3y, 96% of budgetTHE ARC OF NEW MEXICO: $63,575 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ARC PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF DENVER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC ARAPAHOE DOUGLAS & ELBERT COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC - JEFFERSON CLEAR CREEK & GILPIN COUNTIES ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF ADAMS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF AURORA ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF LARIMER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF NORTHEAST COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCACY RESOURCE COALITION PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds ABILITY CONNECTION COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC of West Central Colorado ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF SOUTHWEST COLORADO INC ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF THE CENTRAL MOUNTAINS ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF NEW MEXICO ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Arc of the United States · The Denver Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arc Thrift Stores Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arc Thrift Stores Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arc Thrift Stores’ filings →

    More from the funding graph