Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Aranosian Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.

Animals$62kFood & Nutrition$4kHealth$2kReligion$2kYouth Development$500Arts & Culture$500Public Safety & Disaster$250
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC$7,500
HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CULLMAN AREA ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOC$2,000
WAG$2,000
NO DOGS LEFT BEHIND$2,000
TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
BECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEF$1,000
FRIENDS OF HORN LAKE ANIMAL SHELTER$1,000
VIRGINIA GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE$1,000
BRIGHT HOPE ANIMAL RESUE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
KINDNESS RANCH ANIMAL SANCTUARY$1,000
WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%FOUR PAWS USA: $2k → 16%SAVE KOREAN DOGS USA FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%PAWS OF WAR INC: $1k → 7%NO DOGS LEFT BEHIND: $2k → 17%HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 14%NETWORK FOR ANIMALS USA: $500 → 12%CULLMAN AREA ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOC: $2k → 16%BRIGHT HOPE ANIMAL RESUE: $1k → 17%FRIENDS OF HORN LAKE ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 10%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 28%ARMENIAN MISSIONARY ASSOC OF AMERIC: $600 → 7%KINDNESS RANCH ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1k → 12%THE ROMANIAN LEAGUE IN DEFENSE OF A: $1k → 6%NICALOVE: $1k → 5%WAG: $2k → 7%BECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEF: $1k → 7%SHEPHERDS BEYOND BORDERS: $1k → 15%FOUR PAWS USA: $1k → 16%GUARDIANS OF RESCUE: $1k → 7%NO DOGS LEFT BEHIND: $1k → 17%WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT: $1k → 14%CULLMAN AREA ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOC: $1k → 16%BRIGHT HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 → 17%FRIENDS OF HORN LAKE ANIMAL SHELTER: $500 → 10%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 28%ARMENIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL ASSOC: $500 → 7%THE ROMANIAN LEAGUE IN DEFENSE OF A: $500 → 6%WAG: $1k → 7%BECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEF: $1k → 7%SHEPHERDS BEYOND BORDERS: $1k → 15%FOUR PAWS USA: $500 → 16%CULLMAN AREA ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOC: $500 → 16%BRIGHT HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE: $500 → 17%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 28%PAISLEY'S PLACE AND HOME OF THE UNA: $1k → 7%TROUP 71 BOY SCOUTS: $500 → 7%SHEPHERDS BEYOND BORDERS: $500 → 15%FOUR PAWS USA: $500 → 16%CULLMAN AREA ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOC: $500 → 16%TUNICA HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 28%LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $8k → 7%LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $1k → 7%FRANKLIN ANIMAL SHELTER: $1k → 7%LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC: $1k → 7%FRANKLIN ANIMAL SHELTER: $500 → 7%WARNER CONNECTS: $3k → 7%WARNER CONNECTS: $501 → 7%UNITED CHURCH OF WARNER: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
NY
MA
WY
NJ
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
HI
MS
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$47k · 15 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
11

Total granted

$47k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+14%

Still filing today

47%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • MH
    MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +90%
  • BG
    BECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEF
    2× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • GO
    GUARDIANS OF RESCUE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • RD
    Ring Dog Rescue Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +14%
  • SK
    SAVE KOREAN DOGS USA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue -98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Raskels Rescue
Animals
2
Asian Dogs Rescue Allies

To rescue at risk k-9s from asia.

Animals
3
Anas Safe Haven Rescue Inc

Animal Welfare

Animals
4
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
5
Global Canine and Feline Rescue Association Inc

We rescue cats and dogs suffered on the street and in endangered locations in both new york and china. the mission of our no-kill shelter is to provide stray cats with safe haven and veterinary care before placing them in forever loving…

Animals
6
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
7
Animal Rescuers Without Borders

Battling against the overpopulation of homeless pets and improving the lives of companion animals through rescue, fostering programs, adoption, pet care, educational programs and of course spaying and neutering.

Animals
8
Vietnam Animal Aid and Rescue-Us

Rescue rehabilitation rehoming and sanctuary of community cats and dogs and lifelong care of rescued farmed animal residents.

Animals
9
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
10
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
11
Animal Dominion Rescue

Animal Dominion Rescue is a non-profit organization dedicated to rescuing cats and dogs worldwide, ensuring they find permanent, loving homes. The organization emphasizes direct support to rescuers on the ground, promoting animal welfare,…

Animals
12
Canine Estates Inc
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dedication and Everlasting Love to Animals and the most unlike its peers is Armenian American Cultural Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%43%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%41%10–20yr16%49%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,539

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
8/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC — $9,500 · AnimalsLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INCTunica Humane Society — $5,000 · AnimalsTunica Humane SocietyHumane World for Animals International — $4,000 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals InternationalNO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC — $3,000 · AnimalsNO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INCMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,600 · AnimalsMAUI HUMANE SOCIETYBECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEF — $2,000 · AnimalsBECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEFRing Dog Rescue Inc — $1,500 · AnimalsRomanian League in Defense of Animals — $1,500 · Animals+8 more — $7,500 · Animals+8 moreIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCULLMAN AREA ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION — $4,000 · OtherCULLMAN AREA ANIMAL WELFARE ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient — $3,501 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWAG — $3,000 · OtherWAGIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBRIGHT HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE — $2,000 · OtherBRIGHT HOPE ANIMAL RESCUEFRANKLIN ANIMAL SHELTER — $1,500 · OtherGUARDIANS OF RESCUE INC — $1,500 · OtherSAVE KOREAN DOGS USA FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF HORN LAKE ANIMAL SHELTER — $1,500 · OtherPAISLEY'S PLACE AND HOME OF THE UNA — $1,250 · Other+9 more — $5,100 · Other+9 moreAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,344 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $250 · HealthARMENIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC — $500 · Arts & Culture
Animals$36,600Other$31,351Health$1,594Arts & Culture$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIVE AND LET LIVE FARM INC — $9,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTunica Humane Society — $5,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHumane World for Animals International — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNO DOGS LEFT BEHIND INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBECKY'S GIFT EQUINE RELIEF — $2,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetRing Dog Rescue Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAVE KOREAN DOGS USA FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetRomanian League in Defense of Animals — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,344 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNICALOVE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGUARDIANS OF RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WHITE COAT WASTE PROJECT INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA GERMAN SHEPHERD RESCUE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KINDNESS RANCH ANIMAL SANCTUARY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNetwork for Animals USA Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARMENIAN AMERICAN CULTURAL ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FRIENDLY KITCHEN INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amica Companies Found…Susan & Jerome Ettels…Joyce a Ward Foundati…Bradford Family Found…Seckinger Foundation …PC Fund for Animals C…The Pfizer Foundation…Surendra and Karen Gu…Give Lively Foundatio…Verizon FoundationShell USA Company Fou…Paypal Charitable Giv…
Amica Companies FoundationRI22.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amica Companies Foundation · Susan & Jerome Ettelson Fund · Joyce a Ward Foundation · Bradford Family Foundation · Seckinger Foundation Corporation · PC Fund for Animals Charitable Tr · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Surendra and Karen Gupta Arc Foundation · Give Lively Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Aranosian Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines