Skip to content
Apricity Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Apricity Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$416k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$301kPublic Benefit$219kSocial Science$170kHuman Services$92kHealth$82kAnimals$58kReligion$58kArts & Culture$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $122k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $130k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$8.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE$75,000
NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE$55,000
THE WOODLANDS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$47,500
NATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTER$15,000
JOYRIDE CENTER INC$10,775
CELEBRATE DYSLEXIA SCHOOLS$10,000
COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER$10,000
JOURNEY OF A JOYFUL LIFE DBA JOURNEY SCHOOL$10,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$10,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC$10,000
ALL EARS LISTENING AND LANGUAGE CENTER$10,000
THE ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM INC$10,000
INTERFAITH OF THE WOODLANDS$10,000
OAKLAND UNIVERSITY$10,000
CONROE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DREAM CATCHER STABLES: $3k → 5%PROJECT 4031: $20k → 11%PROJECT 4031: $5k → 11%JS HOUSE INC: $5k → 16%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $20k → 9%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $3k → 9%LOVE FOSTER'S HOPE: $2k → 9%INSPIRATION RANCH: $4k → 9%MISSION NORTHEAST INC: $5k → 9%FAMILY PROMISE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $15k → 9%HOPE'S BRIDGE RESOURCE CENTER: $2k → 9%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
NM
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 32 repeat orgs$173k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
33

Total granted

$1.0M
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

69%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $185k · revenue +33%
  • NR
    NATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $170k · revenue +44%
  • TW
    The Woodlands Christian Academy
    4× · 2022–2025 · $169k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • LI
    LEAVE IT FOR THE POOCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • HH
    Henrys Home Horse and Human Sanctuarygraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue +150%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Community Counseling

When care is within reach, lives change. Texas Community Counseling is a faith-based nonprofit committed to bringing hope and healing through mental health care to the communities that need it the most. We empower individuals to heal,…

Human Services
2
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
3
Laurels House

Laurel's House strengthens the human animal bond improves public health decreases the number of companion animal euthanasia due to overpopulation and diminishes human impact on native wildlife species by providing unprecedented access to…

—
4
Texas Defender Service

See Schedule OTDS fights for the end of mass incarceration and excessive punishment in Texas through direct representation, policy reform, and public education. TDS stands up for the dignity and humanity of people harmed by mass…

Civil Rights
5
Healing With Horses Ranch

Healing with Horses Ranch is a 501(c)(3) equine-facilitated therapy center that is on a mission to promote resilience and independence in mind, body, and soul through the power of the horse in people with disabilities, at-risk youth, and…

Human Services
6
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
7
Serenity Retreat for Healing and Spiritual Renewal

Serenity Retreat exists to equip all generations in a prayer process that allows for a transformational encounter with God.

Religion
8
El Paso Area Christian Counseling Service

Counseling Services offering hope, healing, and restoration to hurting people, marriages, and families using respected therapy practices and solid biblical principles.

Human Services
9
Brazos Employment Enterprises Dba the Bee Community

To provide community, life-long learning, and meaningful work for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
10
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
11
Central Texas Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue and rehabilitation

Animals
12
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspiration Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trinity County Fair & Youth Livestock Show Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/51
Grantees still filing
30/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $184,500 · OtherTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHYNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE: $169,500 · OtherNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTEThe Woodlands Christian Academy: $168,801 · OtherThe Woodlands Christian Academy+55 more: $378,459 · Other+55 moreCrisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center: $43,300 · Human ServicesCrisis Ass…PROJECT 4031 INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT 40…FAMILY PROMISE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $25,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PRO…JS HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMission Northeast Inc: $5,000 · Human Services+4 more: $10,000 · Human Services+4 moreAll Ears Listening and Language Center: $20,000 · EducationNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC: $15,000 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine: $10,000 · EducationCELEBRATE DYSLEXIA SCHOOLS: $10,000 · EducationAMERICAN MAIN STREET INITIATIVE INC: $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,000 · EducationEXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE: $3,000 · EducationJOYRIDE CENTER INC: $18,325 · AnimalsHenrys Home Horse and Human Sanctuary: $6,030 · AnimalsMAGNOLIA EXOTIC BIRD SANCTUARY INC: $6,000 · AnimalsRESCUE FOR PTSD: $5,000 · AnimalsSunny Creek Ranch Equine Services: $5,000 · AnimalsRuby's Home for Good: $4,000 · AnimalsLIFEFIRST INC: $20,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $20,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTER: $30,000 · InternationalOAKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS: $15,000 · Crime & LegalMontgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc: $14,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$901,260Human Services$113,300Education$67,000Animals$44,355Civil Rights$40,000International$30,000Crime & Legal$29,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CLAREMONT INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF STATESMANSHIP & POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: $184,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL REVIEW INSTITUTE: $169,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe Woodlands Christian Academy: $168,801 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCrisis Assistance Center Inc dba Community Assistance Center: $43,300 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH POLICY CENTER: $30,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPROJECT 4031 INC: $25,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY: $25,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetREPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION: $23,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIFEFIRST INC: $20,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetAll Ears Listening and Language Center: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLANDS RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOYRIDE CENTER INC: $18,325 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOLARS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOAKS OF RIGHTEOUSNESS: $15,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMontgomery County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc: $14,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBEARS Etc: $14,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMosaics of Mercy Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCELEBRATE DYSLEXIA SCHOOLS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMontgomery County Fair Association: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHenrys Home Horse and Human Sanctuary: $6,030 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCONROE POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 2y, 7.6% of budgetMAGNOLIA EXOTIC BIRD SANCTUARY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetRESCUE FOR PTSD: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJS HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSunny Creek Ranch Equine Services: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN MAIN STREET INITIATIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMEDILIFE OF HOUSTON INC: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetRuby's Home for Good: $4,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRATION RANCH INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEXECUTIVE WOMENS ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetDREAM CATCHER STABLES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetLove Fosters Hope: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOPES BRIDGE RESOURCE CENTER: $2,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLOVE HEALS YOUTH: $1,250 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPregnancy Assistance Center North: $1,012 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSTON LIVESTOCK SHOW AND RODEO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE WITH AUTISM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHONOR UP: $500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBridgewood Farms Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Montgomery County Com…The Woodforest Charit…Shell USA Company Fou…Junior League of the …Wcn CaresUnited Way of Greater…Greater Houston Commu…The Arena Energy Foun…Waste Not Want NotSgl FoundationRdm Positive Impact F…Montgomery County Foo…
Montgomery County Community FoundationTX34.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Montgomery County Community Foundation · The Woodforest Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Junior League of the Woodlands Inc · Wcn Cares · United Way of Greater Houston · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Arena Energy Foundation · Waste Not Want Not · Sgl Foundation · Rdm Positive Impact Foundation · Montgomery County Food Bank Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Apricity Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Apricity Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Apricity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home