Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ao North America Inc

Promoting excellence in patient care and outcomes in trauma and musculoskeletal disorders by:- improving performance through education- optimizing clinical treatment pathways and guidelines- promoting innovation through research and developmentour purpose is to serve as a credible and validated resource for continuing professional…

$2.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
87
Grants FY2024still arriving
29
States reached
$101k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$12MEducation$6.0MReligion$1.7MArts & Culture$210kScience & Tech$164kHuman Services$20kSocial Science$20kYouth Development$15k
02FY2024 · 87 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k11 grants · $89k
  • $10k–50k62 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $851k
$24,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$101,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO$80,000
CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$74,730
INDIANA UNIVERSITY$65,000
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH ORTHOPAEDIC CENTER$65,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$58,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM$55,000
MAYO CLINIC$52,500
CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$50,000
R ADAMS COWLEY SHOCK TRAUMA CENTER$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AT CHATTANOOGA$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT HOUSTON$50,000
ORTHOCAROLINA SPINE CENTER$45,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OTOLARYNGOLOGY OF CNY LLP: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 65 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

65 repeat relationships — 55 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
29

Total granted

$18M
$983k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+27%

Still filing today

51%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $155k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationScience & TechRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    AO NORTH AMERICA CHARITABLE FUND
    3× · 2020–2022 · $4.6M · revenue +46% · 59% of their budget
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $564k · revenue +16%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2020–2024 · $305k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE
    one grant, 2020 · $88k
  • OS
    ORTHOCAROLINA SPINE CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $65k
  • AL
    ALPHA LAMBDA DELTA
    one grant, 2020 · $65k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tampa General Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Spiegel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 57 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%54%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%37%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%8%35–55yr16%43%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%1/109
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,456

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
50/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $887,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $739,880 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $380,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON — $379,538 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $360,000 · OtherIndiana University School of Medicine — $324,998 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $320,000 · OtherORTHOCAROLINA (AR) — $320,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA — $319,350 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $297,500 · Other+45 more — $4,140,781 · Other+45 moreAO NORTH AMERICA CHARITABLE FUND — $4,620,000 · HealthAO NORTH AMERICA CHARITABLE FUNDMAYO CLINIC — $345,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $304,730 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $300,000 · HealthTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $281,662 · HealthRush University Medical Center — $270,000 · HealthNEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE RELIEF OF THE RUPTURED AND CRIPPLED MAINTAINING THE — $270,000 · Health+18 more — $1,238,378 · Health+18 moreWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $563,850 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSIT…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $382,104 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHE…ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $294,600 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $286,850 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVER…Emory University — $270,000 · EducationEmory UniversityWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $235,000 · EducationWAKE FOREST UNIVERSI…AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $205,000 · EducationAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY R…ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $205,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDI…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $195,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHES…RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $175,000 · EducationUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc — $130,000 · EducationYale University — $120,000 · Education+13 more — $530,486 · Education+13 moreNorthwestern University — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsEnuval — $20,000 · Science & TechUniversity of Kansas Center for Research Inc — $20,000 · Science & TechTHE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · Human Services
Other$8,469,047Health$7,629,770Education$3,592,890Recreation & Sports$45,000Science & Tech$40,000Human Services$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAO NORTH AMERICA CHARITABLE FUND — $4,620,000 over 3y, 59% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $563,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $382,104 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $345,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $304,730 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY — $294,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $286,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC — $281,662 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetRush University Medical Center — $270,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $270,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE RELIEF OF THE RUPTURED AND CRIPPLED MAINTAINING THE — $270,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $239,377 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES — $235,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $205,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $205,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYale University - Subordinates — $198,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $195,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHOCK TRAUMA ASSOCIATES PA — $179,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $175,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Maryland Medical System Foundation Inc — $130,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYale University — $120,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego Spine Foundation — $110,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $96,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEAD AND NECK FOUNDATION — $95,000 over 4y, 85% of budgetST JOHN HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $89,534 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION — $75,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL — $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOrthopaedic Trauma Association — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN — $65,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA MASON MEDICAL CENTER — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University — $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO NEUROSURGERY INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRIH ORTHOPAEDIC FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $34,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUGHSTON FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $24,786 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UPSTATE FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AO NORTH AMERICA CHARITABLE FUND
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds ATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds TAMPA GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds NEW YORK SOCIETY FOR THE RELIEF OF THE RUPTURED AND CRIPPLED MAINTAINING THE
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
  • Who funds AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI
  • Who funds Yale University - Subordinates
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds SHOCK TRAUMA ASSOCIATES PA
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Heart Association IncTX20.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Heart Association Inc · Omega Medical Grants Association · Rheumatology Research Foundation · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Advancement · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assn · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Mayo Clinic · American Cancer Society Inc · The Children's Oncology Group Foundation Inc · Johns Hopkins University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ao North America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation0% of income from government
  • Orlando Health Inc0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ao North America Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ao North America Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph